Bibliographic record
Abstract
We define a [Formula: see text]-equivariant version of the cylindrical contact homology used by Eliashberg–Kim–Polterovich [11] to prove contact non-squeezing for prequantized integer-capacity balls [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and we use it to extend their result to all [Formula: see text]. Specifically, we prove if [Formula: see text] there is no [Formula: see text], the group of compactly supported contactomorphisms of [Formula: see text] which squeezes [Formula: see text] into itself, i.e. maps the closure of [Formula: see text] into [Formula: see text]. A sheaf theoretic proof of non-existence of corresponding [Formula: see text], the identity component of [Formula: see text], is due to Chiu [7] it is not known if this is strictly weaker. Our construction has the advantage of retaining the contact homological viewpoint of Eliashberg–Kim–Polterovich and its potential for application in prequantizations of other Liouville manifolds. It makes use of the [Formula: see text]-action generated by a vertical [Formula: see text]-shift but can also be related, for prequantized balls, to the [Formula: see text]-equivariant contact homology developed by Milin [16] in her proof of orderability of lens spaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".