Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zhang Hua and Zhong Quiquan posed the important question: how can create possibilities of dialogue between Chinese Curriculum wisdom and Western theories and form dynamic relationship between the two(Zhang & Zhong, 2003, p.260), in order to help create bridge on which we are in no hurry to cross over (Pinar, In press) and on which might gather and linger. In fact, such bridges lure us to linger. In this article, I will discuss my transformative process of 'becoming' through my master's studies both in China and in Canada in hopes of building such bridge that enabling us to converse across culture, enabling us, perhaps, to hear in new key. I would like to travel through Foucauldian and Confucian discourses in my own realm of self-creation, struggle toward making sense, envision differently and yearn for third space for contemporary Chinese studies in which curriculum becomes self-generative through such (Wang, 2004, p.20). Chinese as journey in this age of social change and cultural fluidity calls for this third space in which and relationality intertwine, collide, and interact, separate yet together, parted yet holding hands, alone yet with the (Wang, 2004, p.131). There's call for simultaneous movement toward personal reflection and cultural transformation in Chinese curriculum. This is call for internationalization of studies. In this third space, the West and the East can build connections and relationships in such way that differences and the alterity of both self and other can be respected and even promoted under certain conditions(Wang, 2004, p.75). In this third space, hierarchy and discrimination do not exist anymore; instead new democratic bridge will be built across both sides of the ocean. Chinese needs to search for a third space as result of the intercultural conversation, space in which self/subject, other, and universe co-emerge based upon differentiation instead of non-differentiation between subject and object, together yet apart, space in which individuality and sociality are engaged with each other in journey of constructing new forms of life; space moves and is alive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.023 | 0.026 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.026 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".