MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557168806 · doi:10.1002/2016jb013534

Advanced seismic imaging techniques characterize the Alpine Fault at Whataroa (New Zealand)

2016· article· en· W2557168806 on OpenAlexafffund
Vera Lay, Stefan Buske, Adrienn Lukács, Andrew R. Gorman, Stephen Bannister, Douglas R. Schmitt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of AlbertaGerman-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and DevelopmentUniversity of Otago
KeywordsGeologySeismologyFault (geology)BasementBoreholeReflector (photography)Reflection (computer programming)DrillingPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The plate‐bounding Alpine Fault in New Zealand is an 850 km long transpressive continental fault zone that is late in its earthquake cycle. We have acquired and processed reflection seismic data to image the subsurface around the main drill site of the Deep Fault Drilling Project (DFDP‐2). The resulting velocity models and seismic images of the upper 5 km show complex subsurface structures around the Alpine Fault zone. The most prominent feature is a strong reflector at depths of 1.5–2.2 km with an apparent dip of 48° to the southeast below the DFDP‐2 borehole, which we assume to be the main trace of the Alpine Fault. Above the main reflector, parallel reflectors suggest the presence of a ∼600 m wide damage zone. Additionally, subparallel reflectors are imaged that we interpret as secondary branches of the main fault zone. Conjugate faults imaged by the data show the complexity of the subsurface. The derived P wave velocity model reveals a 300–600 m thick sedimentary layer with velocities of ∼2.3 km/s above a schist basement with velocities of 4.5–5.5 km/s. A low‐velocity layer can be observed within the basement at 0.8–2 km depth. A small‐scale low‐velocity anomaly appears at the top of the basement that can be correlated to the fault zone. The results provide a reliable basis for a seismic characterization of the DFDP‐2 drill site that can be used for further structural and geological investigations of the architecture of the Alpine Fault in this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207