Treatment of Severe Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis with High-Dose Immunosuppressive Therapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Early Results of the HALT MS Clinical Trial (Immune Tolerance Network: ITN033AI)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 3075 Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease which in most patients presents as defined relapses followed by remissions (relapsing-remitting (RR)). Over time the clinical course evolves to a gradual but irreversible loss of neurological function to which a neurodegenerative process likely contributes. Previous studies of high-dose immunosuppressive therapy (HDIT) and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) were done in patients with advanced progressive MS and many patients continued to lose neurological function. To investigate the potential benefit of HDIT/HCT to halt the evolution of MS and prevent the development of the neurodegenerative processes, HDIT/HCT was studied in RRMS. A phase II clinical trial of HDIT (BCNU, etoposide, ara-C and melphalan (BEAM) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG)) and autologous HCT was conducted in patients with highly active RRMS who had failed conventional therapy to determine if sustained remissions could be induced. Eligibility criteria required Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 3.0 (moderate disability, fully ambulatory) -5.5 (severe disability, ambulatory only 100 meters without aids) and ≥2 relapses on MS treatment with EDSS worsening over the previous 18 months. Hematopoietic progenitor cells were mobilized with G-CSF and a 10-day course of prednisone. The graft was CD34-selected (Baxter, Isolex). The primary endpoint was treatment-failure defined as a composite endpoint of 1) mortality 2) relapse 3) new lesions on MRI or 4) progression in disability ≥1.0 EDSS point. Adverse events (AE) were recorded according to NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Twenty-five patients at a median age of 38(27–53) years had autologous hematopoietic stem cells collected. There were 7 Grade 3 non-hematopoietic AEs during mobilization; mostly line-associated thromboses and infections. There was 1 Grade 4 AE with pretransplant withdrawal from study; a pulmonary embolus associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and pre-existing arteriovenous malformation in the brain. During mobilization, a MS flare occurred in one patient who was non-compliant with the prednisone prophylaxis. Twenty-four patients proceeded to transplant. Median follow-up is 80(52–232) weeks. Patients were infused with a median of 4.58(2.95–9.73) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Neutrophil recovery occurred at a median of +11(9–15) days. In the 1st year after transplant, there were 17 Grade 3 and 4 Grade 4 non-hematopoietic, non-GI AEs. The Grade 4 AEs were suicide attempt (recorded as 2 separate events), hypokalemia and increase in ALT. At baseline (n=24), one (n=23) and two (n=8) years after HDIT/HCT, the mean EDSS (SD) was 4.42(+/−0.637), 3.78(+/−0.951) and 4.13(+/−0.916) respectively. There was only one case with gadolinium-enhancing lesions after 6 months (at Year 3) (Table 1). T2 lesion volume decreased and T1 lesion volume increased from baseline to Month 12. Despite the decrease in T2 lesion volume, there was early posttransplant loss in brain volume. Four patients failed by the composite endpoint (relapses at +22 and +96 weeks; new MRI brain lesions at +197 weeks and progression of disability/death at +82/138 weeks). Event-free survival at 1 and 2 years was 95.8(90% CI :73.9, 99.4)% and 76.7(90% CI :41.1, 92.4)% respectively. 22/24 patients were without progression of disability at last follow-up.Table 1:Brain MRI: Changes in first year after transplant.Baseline n=24Month 2 n=24Month 6 n=24Month 12 n=23Total Gd+ lesions [n (%)]014 (58%)19 (90%)22 (96%)22 (100%)14 (17%)0 (0%)1 (4%)0 (0%)2+6 (25%)2 (10%)0 (0%)0 (0%)T2 lesion volume change (cc)*n202320Median(min, max)-0.13 (-6.51,1.26)-0.60 (-6.46,1.73)-0.58 (-5.14,0.97)1T1 lesion volume change (cc)*n202320Median (min, max)-0.002 (-1.10, 0.87)0.02 (-0.87, 0.99)0.11 (-0.40,1.74)2Brain volume change (%)*n202419Mean (SD)-0.91 (0.73)3-1.19 (0.86)-1.28 (1.01)*Change from baselineWilcoxon signed rank test: 1) p=0.0014; 2) p=0.0186 3) t-test: p<0.0001Conducted by the Immune Tolerance Network, sponsored by NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. High-dose immunochemotherapy was well-tolerated with few serious early complications. Early control of highly active RRMS was obtained post transplant but has not been complete in all patients. Patient follow-up is planned for 5 years to determine durability of responses. Disclosures: Stuve: Teva Neuroscience, EMD Serono, Roche, Novartis, Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Teva Neuroscience, EMD Serono, Roche, Novartis, Genzyme: Honoraria; Teva Neruoscience: Research Funding. Arnold:NeuroRx Research: Equity Ownership. Wundes:Biogen Idec: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teva pharmaceutics: Consultancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".