MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Treatment of Severe Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis with High-Dose Immunosuppressive Therapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Early Results of the HALT MS Clinical Trial (Immune Tolerance Network: ITN033AI)

2011· article· en· W2557419037 on OpenAlexaff
Richard A. Nash, George J. Hutton, Michael K. Racke, Uday Popat, Steven M. Devine, Linda M. Griffith, Paolo A. Muraro, Harry Openshaw, Peter H. Sayre, Olaf Stüve, Douglas L. Arnold, Lisa Wruck, Annette Wundes, George H. Kraft, James D. Bowen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple sclerosisExpanded Disability Status ScaleTransplantationInternal medicineClinical endpointHematopoietic stem cell transplantationAdverse effectClinical trialPrednisoneSurgeryOncologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3075 Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease which in most patients presents as defined relapses followed by remissions (relapsing-remitting (RR)). Over time the clinical course evolves to a gradual but irreversible loss of neurological function to which a neurodegenerative process likely contributes. Previous studies of high-dose immunosuppressive therapy (HDIT) and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) were done in patients with advanced progressive MS and many patients continued to lose neurological function. To investigate the potential benefit of HDIT/HCT to halt the evolution of MS and prevent the development of the neurodegenerative processes, HDIT/HCT was studied in RRMS. A phase II clinical trial of HDIT (BCNU, etoposide, ara-C and melphalan (BEAM) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG)) and autologous HCT was conducted in patients with highly active RRMS who had failed conventional therapy to determine if sustained remissions could be induced. Eligibility criteria required Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 3.0 (moderate disability, fully ambulatory) -5.5 (severe disability, ambulatory only 100 meters without aids) and ≥2 relapses on MS treatment with EDSS worsening over the previous 18 months. Hematopoietic progenitor cells were mobilized with G-CSF and a 10-day course of prednisone. The graft was CD34-selected (Baxter, Isolex). The primary endpoint was treatment-failure defined as a composite endpoint of 1) mortality 2) relapse 3) new lesions on MRI or 4) progression in disability ≥1.0 EDSS point. Adverse events (AE) were recorded according to NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Twenty-five patients at a median age of 38(27–53) years had autologous hematopoietic stem cells collected. There were 7 Grade 3 non-hematopoietic AEs during mobilization; mostly line-associated thromboses and infections. There was 1 Grade 4 AE with pretransplant withdrawal from study; a pulmonary embolus associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and pre-existing arteriovenous malformation in the brain. During mobilization, a MS flare occurred in one patient who was non-compliant with the prednisone prophylaxis. Twenty-four patients proceeded to transplant. Median follow-up is 80(52–232) weeks. Patients were infused with a median of 4.58(2.95–9.73) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Neutrophil recovery occurred at a median of +11(9–15) days. In the 1st year after transplant, there were 17 Grade 3 and 4 Grade 4 non-hematopoietic, non-GI AEs. The Grade 4 AEs were suicide attempt (recorded as 2 separate events), hypokalemia and increase in ALT. At baseline (n=24), one (n=23) and two (n=8) years after HDIT/HCT, the mean EDSS (SD) was 4.42(+/−0.637), 3.78(+/−0.951) and 4.13(+/−0.916) respectively. There was only one case with gadolinium-enhancing lesions after 6 months (at Year 3) (Table 1). T2 lesion volume decreased and T1 lesion volume increased from baseline to Month 12. Despite the decrease in T2 lesion volume, there was early posttransplant loss in brain volume. Four patients failed by the composite endpoint (relapses at +22 and +96 weeks; new MRI brain lesions at +197 weeks and progression of disability/death at +82/138 weeks). Event-free survival at 1 and 2 years was 95.8(90% CI :73.9, 99.4)% and 76.7(90% CI :41.1, 92.4)% respectively. 22/24 patients were without progression of disability at last follow-up.Table 1:Brain MRI: Changes in first year after transplant.Baseline n=24Month 2 n=24Month 6 n=24Month 12 n=23Total Gd+ lesions [n (%)]014 (58%)19 (90%)22 (96%)22 (100%)14 (17%)0 (0%)1 (4%)0 (0%)2+6 (25%)2 (10%)0 (0%)0 (0%)T2 lesion volume change (cc)*n202320Median(min, max)-0.13 (-6.51,1.26)-0.60 (-6.46,1.73)-0.58 (-5.14,0.97)1T1 lesion volume change (cc)*n202320Median (min, max)-0.002 (-1.10, 0.87)0.02 (-0.87, 0.99)0.11 (-0.40,1.74)2Brain volume change (%)*n202419Mean (SD)-0.91 (0.73)3-1.19 (0.86)-1.28 (1.01)*Change from baselineWilcoxon signed rank test: 1) p=0.0014; 2) p=0.0186 3) t-test: p<0.0001Conducted by the Immune Tolerance Network, sponsored by NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. High-dose immunochemotherapy was well-tolerated with few serious early complications. Early control of highly active RRMS was obtained post transplant but has not been complete in all patients. Patient follow-up is planned for 5 years to determine durability of responses. Disclosures: Stuve: Teva Neuroscience, EMD Serono, Roche, Novartis, Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Teva Neuroscience, EMD Serono, Roche, Novartis, Genzyme: Honoraria; Teva Neruoscience: Research Funding. Arnold:NeuroRx Research: Equity Ownership. Wundes:Biogen Idec: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teva pharmaceutics: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies→French-language works237,207→