MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557460314 · doi:10.1107/s2053273314096247

Precession Electron Diffraction studies of the phase transition in the (NbSe<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>I

2014· article· en· W2557460314 on OpenAlexaff
Maciej Zubko, Joachim Kusz, A. Prodan, Krystian Prusik, J.C. Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron diffractionDiffractionReciprocal latticeScatteringPrecessionGas electron diffractionPhase (matter)CrystallographyPhase transitionCondensed matter physicsCrystal (programming language)Bragg's lawMaterials sciencePhysicsChemistryReflection high-energy electron diffractionOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(NbSe4)3I is at room-temperature (RT) a semimetal, which changes at lower temperatures into a semiconductor [1]. The compound shows nonlinear transport properties with a second order phase transition at 274 K [2]. The symmetry of the RT (NbSe4)3I belongs to the P4/mnc space group and the structure is formed of NbSe4 antiprisms, stacked along the c axis. The Nb atoms are grouped into Nb2 segments and the Se-Se distances are correlated with the Nb chains. The I atoms occupy two types of channels; those running along the [00z] direction contain two I atoms connected to four Se atoms, while the channels along the [½½z] direction host two I atoms connected to eight Se atoms in a square anti-prismatic arrangement. At the (h,k, 1 6n) planes a relatively strong diffuse scattering is present in the form of concentric rings. This scattering is explained by a similar model to the one recently suggested for (NbSe4)10/3I. The model is based on a mismatch between infinite NbSe4 chains, randomly shifted along the c direction. (NbSe4)3I was studied by means of X-ray and electron diffraction with beam precession (PED) [3]. PED patterns usually contain more Bragg peaks than the conventional selected area diffraction patterns, because the intensity of the diffracted beams is integrated over the selected volume of the reciprocal space. An additional advantage of using the beam precession technique is a reduction of the dynamical interactions. Electron diffraction patterns were recorded sequentially, while tilting the crystal around an arbitrary crystallographic axis. Such space tomography allows a three-dimensional inspection of the reciprocal space and a more precise investigation of the diffuse scattering from nano-areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207