Bibliographic record
Abstract
George Bernard Shaw is a prominent playwright of realism in England in the 1900s, and a master of language, doing well in humor and satire. Meanwhile, he spares no efforts to take part in socialist activities and advocate Fabian Socialism. As to the literary creation, he holds the view that the art should reflect the urgent social problems, and rejects the “art for art’s sake” of the aesthetic theory. He once gained the Nobile Prize in Literature for his idealism and humanism in his works. Someone has evaluated him as an extraordinary writer, but not a qualified politician. His representative work Pygmalion shows that Eliza, a girl in poverty, has gradually changed physically and mentally. She comes to find her self-identity and awakens in all aspects during the period she spends with the aristocrats of the bourgeoisie—Higgins and Pickering. The work also shows Bernard’s Fabian Socialism. Pygmalion has been adapted into a musical called My Fair Lady for its overwhelming literary charm. And then the film adaptation of Pygmalion by Hollywood comes into people’s sight and gains great response. Now it has become household. The thesis shows the main character Eliza’s awakening in the follow aspects: the visible changes in appearance, such as dressing, language and behavior, and the invisible ones in the understanding of love and the awakening of spirit. She finds herself admiring the aristocrats of the bourgeoisie—Higgins and Pickering. But when hurt by their selfishness and hypocrisy deeply, she consciously gives up this love and has a new understanding of love. At last, she becomes mature and scores of achievements in the awakening of spirit through the ordeals. After seeking for dignity and freedom bravely, she leads a happy life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".