Hydrogen bonding patterns in hydroxyamidine/α-aminonitrone (AMOX) type compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
N,N'-Disubstituted hydroxyamidines/ α-aminonitrones (AMOXs) present high steric and electronic modularity (substituents can be varied on the central C atom and/or on the N atoms) resulting in precise electronic tunability, enhanced by the delocalization on the amidine backbone. They are good chelating ligands, forming stable 5-membered chelate rings with metal ions, and they also present hydrogen bonding capacity. [1] In our research, we exploit these properties by investigating their incorporation into supramolecular assemblies based on coordination chemistry and/ or hydrogen bonding. Herein, we present the synthesis and the structural characterization of different mono- and bis-AMOX type compounds. [2] The analysis of the hydrogen bonding patterns found in each case is highlighted (Figure 1), in an effort to identify factors (e.g. substituent effects: sterics and/ or electronics, other type of supramolecular interactions) that are generating specific hydrogen-bonding patterns. Understanding and rationalizing such a cause – effect relationship is of paramount importance in order to efficiently use hydrogen bonding as a crystal engineering design tool. Figure 1. Type of hydrogen bonding pattern in AMOX type compounds. [3]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".