MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Precision Measurement of the Boron to Carbon Flux Ratio in Cosmic Rays from 1.9 GV to 2.6 TV with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station

2016· article· en· W2557804650 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. Aguilar, L. Ali Cavasonza, G. Ambrosi, L. Arruda, N. Attig, S. Aupetit, P. Azzarello, A. Bachlechner, F. Barão, Aurélien Barrau, L. Barrin, A. Bartoloni, L. Basara, Seth Pree, Markus Battarbee, R. Battiston, U. Becker, M. Behlmann, B. Beischer, J. Berdugo, B. Bertucci, K. F. Bindel, V. Bindi, G. Boella, W. De Boer, K. Bollweg, V. Bonnivard, B. Borgia, M. J. Boschini, M. Bourquin, E. F. Bueno, Johanna Bürger, F. Cadoux, X.D. Cai, M. Capell, Sami Caroff, J. Casaus, G. Castellini, F. Cervelli, M. J. Chae, Yin-Jung Chang, A. I. Chen, G. M. Chen, H. S. Chen, Lin Cheng, H. Y. Chou, E. Choumilov, V. Choutko, C. H. Chung, C. Clark, R. Clavero, G. Coignet, C. Consolandi, A. Contin, C. Corti, W. Creus, M. Crispoltoni, Z. Cui, Ye Dai, S. Della Torre, O. Demakov, B. Demirköz, L. Derome, S. Di Falco, F. Dimiccoli, C. Díaz, P. von Doetinchem, Fang Dong, F. Donnini, M. Duranti, D. D’Urso, A. I. Egorov, A. Eline, T. Eronen, J. H. Feng, E. Fiandrini, E. Finch, P.H. Fisher, V. Formato, Yu. Galaktionov, G. Gallucci, B. Garćıa, R. J. Garcı́a López, Corrado Gargiulo, H. Gast, Iris Gebauer, M. Gervasi, A. Ghelfi, F. Giovacchini, P. Goglov, D. M. Gómez-Coral, J. Gong, C. Goy, Varlen Grabski, D. Grandi, M. Graziani, K. H. Guo, S. Haino, K. C. Han, Z. H. He, M. Heil, J. Hoffman, Timothy H. Hsieh, H. Huang, Z. C. Huang, C. Huh, M. Incagli, M. Ionica, W. Jang, H. Jinchi, S. C. Kang, K. Kanishev, G. N. Kim, K. S. Kim, Th. Kirn, O. Kounina, A. Kounine, V. Koutsenko, M. S. Krafczyk, G. La Vacca, E. Laudi, G. Laurenti, I. Lazzizzera, A. Lebedev, H. T. Lee, S. C. Lee, C. Leluc, H. S. Li, J. Q. Li, Q. Li, T. X. Li, W. Lin, Y. Li, Z. H. Li, Z. Y. Li, Soobin Lim, Chao‐Hung Lin, P. Lipari, Thomas Lippert, D. Liu, Hu Liu, V. D. Lordello, S. Q. Lu, Yao Lu, K. Luebelsmeyer, Feng Luo, J. Luo, S. S. Lv, F. Machate, R. Majka, C. Mañá, J. Marín, T. Martin, G. Martínez, N. Masi, D. Maurin, A. Menchaca-Rocha, Q. Meng, V. M. Mikuni, Dong-Chuan Mo, L. Morescalchi, P. Mott, T. Nelson, J. Q. Ni, N. Nikonov, F. Nozzoli, A. Oliva, M. Orcinha, F. Palmonari, C. Palomares, M. Paniccia, M. Pauluzzi, S. Pensotti, R. M. Faisca Rodrigues Pereira, N. Picot-Clémente, F. Pilo, C. Pizzolotto, V. Plyaskin, M. Pohl, V. Poireau, A. Putze, L. Quadrani, X. M. Qi, X. Qin, Z. Y. Qu, T. Räihä, P.G. Rancoita, D. Rapin, J. S. Ricol, S. Rosier-Lees, A. Rozhkov, D. Rozza, R. Z. Sagdeev, J. Sandweiss, P. Saouter, S. Schael, Sebastian M. Schmidt, A. Schulz von Dratzig, G. Schwering, E. S. Seo, B. S. Shan, J. Y. Shi, T. Siedenburg, D. Son, Jiwei Song, W. H. Sun, M. Tacconi, X. Tang, Zhi-Cheng Tang, L. Y. Tao, D. Tescaro, Samuel C.C. Ting, S.M. Ting, Nicola Tomassetti, J. Torsti, C. Türkoğlu, T. Urban, V. Vagelli, E. Valente, C. Vannini, E. Valtonen, M. Vázquez Acosta, M. Vecchi, M. Velasco, J. P. Vialle, V. Vitale, S. Vitillo, L. Q. Wang, H. Wang, Qiuliang Wang, X. Wang, X. Q. Wang, Z. X. Wang, Chuncheng Wei, Z. Weng, Kathryn Whitman, J. Wienkenhöver, H. Wu, X. Wu, X. M. Xia, R. Q. Xiong, W. Xu, Qi Yan, J. Yang, Min Yang, Y. Yang, Hemian Yi, Yaxin Yu, Z. Q. Yu, S. Zeissler, C. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. H. Zhang, S. D. Zhang, S. W. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. M. Zheng, Z. Q. Zhu, H.L. Zhuang, V. Zhukov, A. Zichichi, N. Zimmermann, P. Zuccon

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasHorizon 2020Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e InnovaciónInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeJohnson Space CenterMarshall Space Flight CenterProducteurs d'oeufs d'incubation du CanadaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceChina Scholarship CouncilAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaNational Research Foundation of KoreaTekesSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungStrongDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaChinese Academy of SciencesCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaEwha Womans UniversityAcademy of FinlandU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCentro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico IndustrialAcademia SinicaInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyEuropean CommissionCERNTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaKyungpook National UniversityAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science FoundationEuropean Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCosmic rayRigidity (electromagnetism)PhysicsBoronSpectral indexTurbulenceAstrophysicsInternational Space StationFlux (metallurgy)SpectrometerCOSMIC cancer databaseNuclear physicsIsotopes of boronCarbon fibersComputational physicsAtomic physicsSpectral lineOpticsAstronomyQuantum mechanicsMeteorologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge of the rigidity dependence of the boron to carbon flux ratio (B/C) is important in understanding the propagation of cosmic rays. The precise measurement of the B/C ratio from 1.9 GV to 2.6 TV, based on 2.3 million boron and 8.3 million carbon nuclei collected by AMS during the first 5 years of operation, is presented. The detailed variation with rigidity of the B/C spectral index is reported for the first time. The B/C ratio does not show any significant structures in contrast to many cosmic ray models that require such structures at high rigidities. Remarkably, above 65 GV, the B/C ratio is well described by a single power law R^{Δ} with index Δ=-0.333±0.014(fit)±0.005(syst), in good agreement with the Kolmogorov theory of turbulence which predicts Δ=-1/3 asymptotically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations331
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207