Fludarabine-Busulfan Conditioning and In Vivo T-Cell Depletion with Reduced Dose of ATG Followed by Allografting Induces Durable Responses in Patients with Advanced Multiple Myeloma with No Grade III-IV aGvHD.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: We have investigated a conditioning regimen with Fludarabine and intravenous Busulfan with reduced ATG dose in patients with advanced and poor prognosis myeloma exploring the possibility that a low dose ATG may be sufficient enough to prevent severe GvHD without completely suppressing the graft vs myeloma effect. Methods: 15 patients received a conditioning regimen consisting of fludarabine 50mg/m2 on days -6 to -2 and IV BU (Busulfex, ESP Pharma) at a “myeloablative” dose of 3.2 mg/kg daily days -5 to -2 inclusive. All pts received Thymoglobulin (Genzyme) 4.5 mg/kg in divided doses over 3 consecutive days pre-transplant finishing D0, cyclosporine A and methotrexate with folinic acid. Results: The median age was 49 years (range 40–61). 14 (93.3%) patients had stage III (DS) disease with a median β2-microglobulin 3.12 mg/dl (1.82–5.75) and 7/11 (63.6%) in whom FISH studies were available had deletion 13, 5/15 (33.3%) patients had relapsed or progressed within 2 years of prior autologous stem cell transplant and 4 (26.6%) had progressed while on thalidomide /Dex salvage treatment. The disease status prior to allogeneic transplant was partial response (PR) in 6/15 (40%) and progressive disease (PD) in 9/15 (60%). 2/15 had plasma cell leukemia. The median number of bone marrow plasma cells prior to allo-transplant was 16% (range 3%-85%). Donors were matched siblings (MRD) for 13 (86.7%) and alternate donors in 2 (13.3%, unrelated with 2 C antigen mismatch). Cell source was blood in 14/15 (93.3%). Acute GVHD grade II-IV occurred in only 1 patient (6.6%) with no grade III-IV acute GVHD. Chronic GVHD occurred in 9/15 (60%). The TRM was 6.6%. Among 14/15 patients evaluable for response, the overall response rate (CR+PR) was 53.3% (2 CR, 6 PR, 1 MR and 5 PD); 37.5% (1CR, 2PR, 1MR and 4PD) for pts with PD at the time of the transplant and 71.4% (4PR, 1MR and 1PD) for pts with del13. After a median follow-up of 40.9 months (range 36–65.2), the estimated OS and PFS at 4 years for all patients is 38.9% (CI 95%: 13.1–64.7%) and 20.0% (CI 95%: 0–40.3%) respectively. For patients with del13 the estimated OS and PFS at 4 years is 38.1% (CI 95%: 0–77.9%) and 0% respectively. Conclusion: In vivo T-cell depletion with ATG results in a low rate of severe aGvHD with low treatment-related mortality and a substantial number of long-term survivors among patients with advanced multiple myeloma. The detection of deletion 13 by FISH however remains a predictor of short progression free survival. Figure Figure
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".