Random point processes and tilings arising from Gaussian analytic functions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Getting a grasp of what aperiodic order really entails is going to require collecting and understanding many diverse examples. Aperiodic crystals are at the top of the largely unknown iceberg beneath. Here we present a recently studied form of random point process in the (complex) plane which arises as the sets of zeros of a specific class of analytic functions given by power series with randomly chosen coefficients: Gaussian analytic functions (GAF). These point sets differ from Poisson processes by having a sort of built in repulsion between points, though the resulting sets almost surely fail both conditions of the Delone property. Remarkably the point sets that arise as the zeros of GAFs determine a random point process which is, in distribution, invariant under rotation and translation. In addition, there is a logarithmic potential function for which the zeros are the attractors, and the resulting basins of attraction produce tilings of the plane by tiles which are, almost surely, all of the same area. We discuss GAFs along with their tilings and diffraction, and as well note briefly their relationship to determinantal point processes, which are also of physical interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it