MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558139966 · doi:10.1080/07060661.2016.1261372

Molecular and morphological characterization of <i>Moniliophthora roreri</i> isolates from cacao in Ecuador

2016· article· en· W2558139966 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
María Gabriela Maridueña-Zavala, Mirian Villavicencio-Vásquez, Juan Manuel Cevallos‐Cevallos, Esther Lilia Peralta

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMyceliumBotanyInternal transcribed spacerPhylogenetic treeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moniliophthora roreri – the causal agent of frosty pod rot (FP) disease – is one of the most devastating cacao pathogens in Ecuador and worldwide. The centre of diversity of this pathogen is believed to be in areas near Ecuador or Colombia but molecular, morphological and growth studies of this pathogen in Ecuador are scarce. Monosporic cultures of M. roreri from the six cacao-producing regions of Ecuador, including Esmeraldas, El Oro, Los Rios, Guayas, Manabi and Amazon were obtained. Morphological characteristics, such as mycelial growth, colony shape, colour and texture, as well as type and size of meiospores, were recorded for each isolate. Molecular variation was assessed by direct sequencing the ITS1, 5.8 s, and ITS2 rDNA regions as well as by RFLP analyses on the same regions. Results showed little variation of morphological traits across isolates. Mycelial growth rate fitted to a Gompertz model with parameters estimates that were significantly affected by mycelial colour. Molecular analysis data showed an average polymorphism of 48.98% and Shannon’s diversity index of 0.21. Multiple discriminant analyses carried out on the RFLP patterns showed a 100% accurate grouping by both sampling province and mycelial colour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicCocoa and Sweet Potato AgronomyFrench-language works237,207