MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558242395 · doi:10.1107/s2053273314091219

Realtime X-ray reflectometry to see changes at buried interfaces

2014· article· en· W2558242395 on OpenAlexaff
Kenji Sakurai, Mari Mizusawa, Krassimir N. Stoev

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAngular resolution (graph drawing)OpticsReflectometryMonochromatorX-ray reflectivitySurface finishDetectorX-ray opticsAngular diameterPhysicsRange (aeronautics)Materials scienceWavelengthX-rayReflectivityComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X-ray reflectometry is powerful in determining internal structure of multilayered thin films, such as thickness and density of each layer, as well as the roughness of surface and interfaces [1]. The measurement requires some precise angular scans near the critical angle with monochromatic parallel X-rays, and therefore it has not been thought that the technique is basically suitable to see changes. However, even without any angular scans, it is possible to obtain essentially the same data by using wide angular dispersion of the incident X-ray beam. The principle is basically known as Naudon's pioneering concept [2]. The system has been improved further by employing a monochroator, which was not used by Naudon's work. A multilayer monochromator was placed at very narrow limited space between a rotating anode X-ray source and the sample stage [3]. Use of a fast Si strip detector also contributed to improve the time-resolution. One can obtain an X-ray reflectivity curve with 4.5 decades even in 1 sec. It is possible to measure the curve down to 10-6, if 20 sec accumulation is allowed. Another advantage of the present instrument is fairly wide angular divergence, which ensures simultaneous data collection for 2 deg range. One of our recent successful applications of this method is the measurement of thermal expansion factor of the polymer thin film. It was also possible to see melting and freezing surfaces. In the presentation, such practical application will be demonstrated, in addition to the detailed description of our instruments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207