MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2558450726 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now212.048

ACTR-50. MARIZOMIB (MRZ) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) IN WHO GRADE IV MALIGNANT GLIOMA (G4 MG): FULL ENROLLMENT RESULTS FROM THE PHASE 1, MULTICENTER, OPEN-LABEL STUDY

2016· article· en· W2558450726 on OpenAlexaff
Daniela A. Bota, Annick Desjardins, Warren Mason, Howard A. Fine, Santosh Kesari, Steven D. Reich, Anshu Vashishtha, Nancy K. Levin, Mohit Trikha

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGliomaInternal medicinePopulationProgressive diseaseCohortSurgeryTolerabilityGastroenterologyAdverse effectChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MRZ is an irreversible, brain-penetrant, pan-proteasome inhibitor (PI) with anti-MG efficacy preclinically in vitro and in vivo. The safety, pharmocokinetics, and activity of MRZ+BEV is evaluated in BEV-naïve G4 MG patients (pts) in first or second relapse (no prior anti-angiogenic or PI therapy), in a 3+3 dose-escalation (MRZ 0.55 (6 pts), 0.7 (3 pts), and 0.8 mg/m2 (3 pts)) followed by dose-expansion (0.8 mg/m2, 24 pts). Treatments administered IV, 28-day cycles: MRZ (10 min) days 1, 8, & 15; BEV (10 mg/kg) days 1 & 15. Tumor response assessed every other cycle by RANO criteria; MRZ and BEV pharmacokinetics, and proteasome inhibition in circulating blood cells also evaluated. Data reported as of 17 May 2016; median age 55 yrs (range 27–76 yrs), 64% male, Karnofsky score ≥70. Duration of dosing 0.5–11.6 months to date; treatment ongoing in 16 pts. Study treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs: fatigue, headache, hypertension, hallucination, confusional state, ataxia; one Grade 4 SAE (appendicitis perforated, not related to study treatment), one Grade 5 SAE (intracranial hemorrhage, BEV-related). One pt (cohort 1) had DLT (fatigue); no other DLTs occurred. N=36 for the intent-to-treat population; 30 pts efficacy evaluable by RANO criteria. Overall response (≥ partial response, PR) 39% (14/36, including 5 with complete target lesion response and 2 unconfirmed PRs); 11 stable disease, 5 progressive disease. PFS 6-months is 39%; median OS not yet reached. MGMT status known for 15 of 36 pts; 14 unmethylated (uMGMT), 1 methylated. Seven of 14 uMGMT pts achieved ≥PR; 49% PFS 6-months in uMGMT subgroup. Preliminary activity in uMGMT subgroup suggests therapeutic advantage provided by brain-penetrant PI in comparison with BEV single agent (Taal et al., 2014). MRZ+BEV combination is well tolerated with promising early signs of efficacy in recurrent G4 MG pts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicRenal cell carcinoma treatment→French-language works237,207→