Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is no surprise that more than 100 journals specialize in the field of Endocrinology and Metabolism, many with a focus on diabetes. The Journal of Diabetes was started to foster collaboration between investigators from East and West; it has an international Editorial team, with both Asian and Western participation, and now has contributions from China, the US, India, Australia, Canada, Spain, Iran, Italy, Japan, Turkey, and many other countries. We enter Volume 9 with the decision to publish monthly issues. Over the first 8 years of publication, nearly 700 manuscripts have been published, over some 4000 pages. Our current acceptance rate is around one-fifth of submissions. We have been gratified by the continued increase in citations, giving the Journal an impact factor of 2.5. Most of our readership is now online. In total, we have seen nearly 500 000 abstract views and 300 000 full-text downloads, with a gratifying pattern of increase in usage (Fig. 1). Nearly 2500 institutions now allow clinicians and researchers to access the latest content in the Journal, and we anticipate that readership will continue to increase. It seems that the future of publication will increasingly be online, and we have decided in 2017 to move to an online-only publication. We are including representative figures of some manuscripts in the email Table of Contents, and encourage all readers to sign up for these free emails from our home page (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/user-registration). In addition, the full text of the editorial and news features and two articles will be freely available for each issue, and we are exploring additional online access formats, with presence on WeChat (search for “yitangwang”) and an iOs app (available in the App Store by searching for “Journal of Diabetes”). With a world diabetes prevalence of 415 million people and projections that that number will increase by more than half over the next quarter of a century,1, 2 we need more and better understanding of diabetes and newer approaches to its management. The Journal of Diabetes looks forward to collaboration with the Diabetes community and thanks you, our readers, for your ongoing participation. 目前专攻内分泌与代谢领域的期刊有100多种,这毫不为奇,并且有许多期刊把目光聚焦在了糖尿病领域。糖尿病杂志创刊的目的是促进东西方国家研究者之间的合作;它拥有一支国际化的编辑团队,既有亚洲也有西方国家的参与者,目前主要来自于中国、美国、印度、澳大利亚、加拿大、西班牙、伊朗、意大利、日本、土耳其以及其他许多国家。 我们决定从第9卷开始每月出版1期。在前面8年出版的期刊中,已经发表的稿件将近700篇,大约超过了4000个页面。我们目前的接受率大约为投稿总数的五分之一。令我们感到欣慰的是被引用的频率在不断增加,目前杂志的影响因子为2.5。 目前我们的大部分读者都是在线阅读的。总共我们已经看到了约500000篇的摘要被浏览过,300000篇的全文被下载过,可喜的是使用率在不断增加(图1)。目前大约有2500家机构允许临床医生与研究人员阅读本杂志的最新内容,并且我们预计读者人数将会继续增加。目前看来未来的出版物将会越来越多地采用在线模式,我们已经决定从2017年开始转变为只出版在线期刊。我们收录了一些在电子邮件内容表中具有代表性的稿件,并且鼓励所有的读者都能够在我们的主页上完成注册(http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/user-registration)以免费获取这些邮件。另外,每一期的社论、新闻特写以及两篇全文都是免费提供在线阅读的,我们还在探索其他的在线阅读模式,提供了微信(搜索“yitangwang”)以及iOs应用软件(在应用软件商店搜索“糖尿病杂志”)平台。 目前全世界的糖尿病患病率为4.15亿人,并且预计在接下来的四分之一世纪里这个数字将增加一半以上1,2,我们需要更多以及更好地了解糖尿病,并且需要新的糖尿病管理方法。糖尿病杂志期待能够与各种糖尿病社会团体进行紧密合作,感谢你们,我们的读者,感谢你们持续不断地支持我们。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".