Bibliographic record
Abstract
The soil bacterium, Pseudomonas putida, is capable of using the alicyclic compound quinate as a sole carbon source. During this process, quinate is converted to 3-dehydroshikimate, which subsequently undergoes a dehydration to form protocatechuate. The latter transformation is performed by the enzyme dehydroshikimate dehydratase (DSD). We have recombinantly produced DSD from P. putida and are currently performing x-ray crystallographic studies on the enzyme to gain structural insight into its catalytic mechanism and mode of substrate recognition. Initial crystals of DSD diffracted to 2.7 Ä resolution, but exhibited strong twinning. A redesigned construct has recently yielded crystals that diffract to similar resolution, but with a significantly reduced tendency toward twinning. Interestingly, sequence analysis of P. putida DSD reveals that the protein is in fact a fusion of two distinct domains: an N-terminal sugar phosphate isomerase-like domain associated with DSD activity, and a C-terminal hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-like domain with unknown functional significance. Structural characterization of the protein may provide novel insight into the functional relevance of the unusual HPPD-like domain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".