CORRELATION BETWEEN SERUM CTX-1 AND PERCEIVED COMPLIANCE TO TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH FRAGILITY FRACTURES: PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF 543 PATIENTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treat to target is the use of a physiologic marker as a monitor of effectiveness or compliance to an intervention. A recent example has been the progressive use of CTX-1 (Marker of osteoclastic activity) as a surrogate of bone resorptive activity in osteoporosis treatment. CTX-1 levels were demonstrated to be inversely related to drug efficacy in the suppression of bone resorption. As far as fragility fractures are concerned, no reference value of CTX-1 for any index fracture sites was found in the literature. In order to prevent subsequent fractures, efforts to better manage this chronic disease are to be explored. The main objective of this study was to compare and validate the use of serum CTX-1 to the perceived compliance to treatment. Five hundred and forty three patients (men and women) 40 years of age or older who had been treated for a fragility fracture were enrolled. The purpose of this study was to correlate the measurement of CTX-1 with the perceived compliance to treatment of patients at the time of fracture and at six, 12 and 18 months after initiation of treatment. Our secondary objectives were to evaluate two different CTX-1 suppression target levels (CTX-1 Considering index fractures, compliant patients under treatment at baseline had lower CTX-1 levels than non-compliant patients (p=0.052). Patients who were compliant to treatment at six, 12 and 18 months also had lower CTX-1 levels than non-compliant patients (p=0.000). When index fractures were divided into fracture sites, regardless of CTX-1 suppression target level (i.e. CTX-1 The correlation between serum CTX-1 at the time of fracture and at six, 12, 18 months and the perceived compliance to treatment was validated for NHNV fractures supporting the concept of the available treatments and their effects on bone remodeling for this type of fracture. The correlation was not validated for hip neither for vertebral fracture. There was no correlation between CTX-1 levels and subsequent fracture risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".