Identification of Catalytic Residues in ATP-Citrate Lyase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An enzyme in the human body that regulates lipogenesis and cholesterolgenesis is ATP-citrate lyase (ACLY) [1]. ACLY synthesizes acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate from citrate, CoA and ATP, with citryl-CoA as an intermediate [1]. The product acetyl-CoA is involved in cell growth as well as embryonic and brain development [1]. Studies in mice suggest that ACLY is important during brain development as homozygous Acly knockout mouse embryos died early in development [2]. Knowledge of the reaction mechanism is limited and will be of use in understanding the energy flow in cells. Our current insight into the mechanism by which citryl-CoA is cleaved to form acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate is based on sequence similarity of ACLY to citrate synthase (CS). Both enzymes have histidine and aspartic acid residues at similar positions in their sequences. We hypothesize that citryl-CoA binds at this site in ACLY and is cleaved into acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate using these residues. To test this hypothesis, we have mutated these residues to alanine in both human ACLY and ACLY from the bacterium, Chlorobium limicola. Enzymatic activities of the mutant proteins were tested using a coupled-enzyme assay with malate dehydrogenase. The inactive mutants are being used in crystallization trials with substrates, since complexes of the intermediate citryl-CoA can be trapped on the protein. To date, the crystal structure of full-length ACLY has not been published. The structure of only the amino-terminal two-thirds of the human enzyme has been determined [3]; however, the part of the protein that is similar to CS is the carboxy-terminal portion. This work identifies the catalytic residues of ACLY and complements the previous structure determination, increasing our currently limited knowledge about this enzyme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".