MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558878285 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003381

Teaching Neuro <i>Images</i> : Orbital infarction syndrome from giant cell arteritis

2016· article· en· W2558878285 on OpenAlexaff
David Kim, Adrian Budhram, David M. Pelz, Maria MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGiant cell arteritisHeadachesCentral retinal artery occlusionHypoesthesiaSuperficial temporal arteryPtosisIschemic optic neuropathyOptic nerveRadiologyOphthalmic arteryArteritisOphthalmologyVasculitisSurgeryVisual acuityMiddle cerebral arteryPathologyIschemiaCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 76-year-old man with a 3-month history of headaches, scalp pain, and jaw claudication presented with unilateral right eye complete ptosis, near-complete ophthalmoplegia, a fixed mid-dilated pupil, corneal edema with stromal thickening, and hypoesthesia in the right trigeminal V1 distribution. Temporal artery biopsy confirmed giant cell arteritis. CT angiography showed absent filling of the right ophthalmic artery and luminal narrowing affecting the right superficial temporal artery. MRI showed T2 diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensity along the right optic nerve in the optic canal and bulbus oculi (figure). His clinicoradiographic presentation was consistent with orbital infarction syndrome.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207