MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558985041

Hospital Chief Financial Officers in the United States and Canada

2016· article· en· W2558985041 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Pitman

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep Blue (University of Michigan) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Policy and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinanceBusinessPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The roles played by chief financial officers (CFOs) across industries have evolved over the years beyond the areas of treasury and controllership to become more strategically focused today. Relative to CFOs in other industries, hospital CFO responsibilities are more likely to be traditionally focused on the finance function. Hospitals are subject to unique forces and constraints not generally apparent in other sectors of the economy. They are highly regulated and are characterized by unique organizational forms, services and reimbursement. There remain many questions about the activities of hospital CFOs. This dissertation highlights some of the questions and suggests some answers. The intent of this dissertation is to better understand the roles and compensation of hospital CFOs in the US and Canada. Taken together these topics attempt to build a more holistic perspective on the activities and roles of hospital chief financial officers. The three papers in this dissertation ask the following questions: (1) Are the jobs of hospital CFOs different from those of CFOs in other industries? (2) Are the jobs of hospital CFOs in the United States different from those of hospital CFOs in Canada? (3) Do hospitals in the US and Canada pay their CFOs half the compensation of their chief executive (CEO) officers? The first two questions utilize a work survey of hospital CFOs. The third question utilizes compensation data from not-for-profit hospitals (Ontario, Canada and New Hampshire) and for-profit hospitals (across the US). The results indicate that hospital CFOs are different from their counterparts in other industries. Typically, a hospital CFO has a stronger academic background, greater internal focus and strong operational expertise. CFOs in Canada and the US have differences in their backgrounds and in the activities they perform. Relative to the more administrator type of role played by Canadian CFOs, US CFOs lead more general manager-like roles. Their work appears to be less focused on traditional finance functions. Evidence supports the hypothesis that hospitals may be employing behavioral economics based heuristics and paying their CFOs roughly half the compensation they pay their CEOs. In Ontario, hospital financial performance did not predict CFO compensation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDeep Blue (University of Michigan)Same topicHealthcare Policy and ManagementFrench-language works237,207