MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559017963 · doi:10.1107/s2053273314089621

Celebrating crystallography from K to 12 at CIMF, Montreal

2014· article· en· W2559017963 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul Pillot, Paul Heron, C. LowKam, Vincent Barbier, Françoise Beylich, Anne-Laure Chambon, Jocelyne Falletto, Morgane Leroux, J.P. Pelé, J. Sygusch, Dominique Kajetanek, Célia Kremer, Magali Legris

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and History of Science
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppealCuriosityMathematics educationOutreachSociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceLawSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If crystallography is well known to many scientists, this is not true for the general public. Aims of the international year of crystallography include the desire to increase public awareness, to stimulate the intellectual curiosity of students and to promote crystallographic education. At the College International Marie de France, we decided to tackle these challenges and celebrate IYCR2014 with students from kindergarten to grade 10 and by an outreach with the Universite de Montreal (UdeM). We will illustrate how, beyond appreciating the mesmerizing ordered crystal growth from a saturated solution, studying and performing crystallization activities has a proven track record for fostering academic and practical skills. If crystallography starts by the Bragg's iconic law, then most undergraduate students will not appreciate it. However, crystals do have an intrinsic aesthetic appeal that can serve as a starting point to stimulate students' interest. Instead of teaching crystallography as a discipline, could we not teach key scientific concepts through it? We devised three distinct approaches addressing skills and notions appropriate to students in kindergarten, primary or grade 10 school levels. Younger pupils can make descriptions, comparisons and learn about symmetry and growth based upon the observation of snowflakes or crystal growth from solution, encouraging them to formulate basic concepts regarding solubility and changes in states of matter. Growing crystals allows primary students to practice mathematical skills such as measuring angles, masses, volumes and describing shapes. This sets the stage for problem solving using the scientific method. Older students take part in workshops ranging from diffraction patterns generated by lasers to simulating growth with cellular automata. They also undertake protein crystallization experiments in partnership with UdeM thereby offering unique access to crystallographic facilities and insight into scientific research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicPhilosophy and History of ScienceFrench-language works237,207