MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559039662 · doi:10.1107/s2053273314096934

An UBR-box from a non-N-recognin: Crystal Structure of the UBR domain of UBR6

2014· article· en· W2559039662 on OpenAlexaff
J. Munoz-Escobar, Guennadi Kozlov, Jean‐François Trempe, Kalle Gehring

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDegronUbiquitin ligaseChemistryUbiquitinSkp1DNA ligaseBiochemistryBiologyDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The degradation of many short-lived proteins in eukaryotic cells is carried out by the Ubiquitin Proteasome System. The N-end rule pathway links the half-life of proteins to the identity of its N-terminal residue, also called N-degron. Destabilizing N-degrons, are recognized by E3 ubiquitin ligases termed N-recognins. N-degrons are grouped into type 1, composed of basic residues, and type 2, composed of bulky hydrophobic residues. In mammals, four N-recognins mediate the N-end rule pathway: UBR1, UBR2, UBR4 and UBR5. These proteins share a ~70-residue zinc finger-like motif termed the Ubiquitin Recognin (UBR) box, responsible for their specificity. The mammalian genome encodes at least three more UBR-box proteins: UBR3, UBR6/FBXO11 and UBR7. However, these UBRs cannot recognize any type of N-degrons. Our lab reported the crystal structures of the UBR boxes from the human UBR1 and UBR2, rationalizing the empirical rules for the classification of type 1 N-degrons. Despite the valuable information obtained from those structures there is not a clear explanation for the no recognition of N-degrons by other UBR-box proteins. Here we report the crystal structure of the UBR-box domain from UBR6 also known as FBXO11. UBR6 is a F-box protein of the SKP1-Cullin1-F-box (SCF) ubiquitin ligase complex and does not recognize any type of N-degrons. We crystallized a 77-residue fragment of the UBR-box of UBR6 and determined its structure at 1.7 Å resolution. Unexpectedly, this domain adopts an open conformation compared to UBR1-box, without any N-degron binding pockets. Its zinc-binding residues are conserved as in the N-recognins, but they are arranged in different zinc-binding motifs. Molecules form dimmers stabilized by zinc ions. The crystal had 4 molecules per asymmetric unit and space group P212121. For phasing we used Zn-SAD. With this structure we hope to obtain clues that explain the absence of N-degron recognition in some members of the UBR family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207