MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Exaggerated B Cell CpG Response in Human Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Potential Mechanism and Biomarker for Diagnosis of Chronic GVHD.

2004· article· en· W2559260065 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin She, Andrew L. Gilman, Kirk R. Schultz

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunologyGraft-versus-host diseaseMedicineImmune systemTransplantationTLR9Flow cytometryPeripheral blood mononuclear cellBiologyInternal medicineDNA methylationIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) is a major limitation to successful allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a cell-wall component of gram negative bacteria that signals through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), is an established contributor to acute GVHD. Our lab has previously shown that splenocytes from mice with acute GVHD were hyper-responsive to CpG, unmethylated DNA with C-G repeats from bacteria and viruses, which induce rapid responses by dendritic cells, B cells, and monocytes through TLR9. As part of Children’s Oncology Group phase III randomized trial ASCT0031 evaluating the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic GVHD, peripheral blood was drawn for immune phenotype and functional studies in patients and control (no GVHD, 80–120 days post allogeneic transplant). The non-BMT group were healthy adult volunteers. After Ficoll isolation, lymphocytes were cultured with or without synthetic human immunostimulatory CpG 2006 (6μg/mL) or LPS (1μg/mL) for 48 hours and analyzed by flow cytometry. Cell surface marker expression was evaluated as fold difference between stimulated and unstimulated cells. In some samples, B cells were purified by negative selection to determine proliferative response and/or for the quantitation of TLR9 mRNA. Chronic GVHD samples had a 3.7 +/− 1.2 fold (n=11) increase in B cell CD40 mean channel fluorescence after CpG stimulation which was significantly greater than in the control group at 1.0 +/− 0.6 fold (n=3, Mann-Whitney U test p=0.02) and the non-BMT group at 1.5 +/− 0.9 fold (n=3, p=0.01). Similarly, chronic GVHD samples had a 9.1 +/− 5.7 fold (n=10) increase in the percentage of B cells expressing CD86 after CpG stimulation which was significantly greater than the control group at 2.1 +/− 2.1 fold (n=4, p=0.008) and the non-BMT group at 2.7 +/− 0.9 fold (n=5, p=0.008). Responses to LPS stimulation or culture without stimulation were not significantly different between the three groups. Purified B cells from GVHD samples (n=3) had enhanced mitogenic response to CpG compared to the control group (n=1), non-BMT group (n=2), and to non-stimulated cells. CpG response appears to be closely correlated with TLR9 mRNA expression (R2=0.82). These findings suggest that CpG responsiveness or TLR9 mRNA expression may potentially be useful as a biomarker for diagnosis or staging of chronic GVHD. Further evaluation on larger numbers of samples is required to confirm these observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207