MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559377611 · doi:10.4043/27421-ms

Temperature Distribution during Solidification of Saline and Fresh Water Droplets after Striking a Super-Cooled Surface

2016· article· en· W2559377611 on OpenAlexafffund
Debashish Saha, S. R. Dehghani, Kevin Pope, Yuri S. Muzychka

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Technology Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersPetroleum Research Newfoundland and Labrador
KeywordsSupercoolingSplashEnvironmental scienceSaline waterSeawaterIcingFresh waterArcticMaterials scienceSalinityGeologyMeteorologyOceanographyEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents an experimental investigation of the freezing process of fresh and saline water droplets impacted upon a supercooled surface. Freshwater solidification is a common and highly investigated phenomenon due to its application in the aircraft industry and power transmission lines. The freezing behavior of salt water, mostly encountered in marine vessels and offshore structures, is very complicated compared to fresh water due to the salt content. A comparative effort to analyze the difference and similarity between these two diverse forms are rare due to its application in contrasting industries. The present study correlates the differing ice accretion behaviors of salt and fresh water. The experiments involve the measurement of thermal distribution and physical spreading of fresh and saline water droplets as they strike and solidify on a super-cooled surface. The results show that presence of salt content in water affects the cooling time, splash area and cooling pattern for droplets. The new experimental data provides new insights on the fundamentals of sea water icing and is key to predicting marine icing in offshore arctic and sub-arctic environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArctic Technology ConferenceSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207