Wind Energy Potentials and Its Trend in the South China Sea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using a 30year (1976-2005) daily high-resolution reanalysis wind field dataset assimilated from several meteorological data sources, the wind speed and power characteristics of the South China Sea (SCS) were investigated using the Weibull shape and scale parameters. The region in general showed good wind characteristics. This is shown by high annual mean wind speed and power density values which are 5.93 m/s and 273.84 W/m2 respectively. The calculated annual mean wind power resource attributes the region to a relatively high potential site for large- scale grid connected wind turbine applications. The wind power ranged between 96.27 W/m2 in May and 527.03 W/m2 in December. Furthermore, spatio-temporal variations showed that strong trends in wind power exist in Luzon strait in the northern SCS and Xisha, Zhongsha, Luzon, Liyue bank in the central SCS which are evaluated as high wind potential regions and may be rated as locations excellent for installation of large wind turbines for electrical energy generation. Non-significant and negative trends dominate the southern SCS and may therefore, be suitable for small wind applications. The wind power density exhibited a significant increasing trend of 1.4 W/m2 yr-1 in the SCS as a whole throughout the study period. The trend is strongest (2.8 W/m2 yr-1) in winter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".