The Effects of Zoledronic Acid Dose and Infusion Rate on Pharmacokinetics (PK), Pharmacodynamics (PD), and Renal Function in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid has demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of bone lesions in patients with multiple myeloma. However, bisphosphonates are known to have dose-dependent and infusion rate-dependent effects on renal function and patients with multiple myeloma may have disease-associated compromise of renal function. The pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of monthly intravenous (IV) infusions of zoledronic acid (4, 8, and 12 mg) were investigated in a subset of patients with multiple myeloma as part of an open-label, phase I, multiple-dose study. Doses higher than the approved 4-mg dose were infused over 1 or 2 hours based on an infusion-rate model that predicted a Cmax similar to that of the approved regimen (4 mg via 15-minute IV infusion). Moreover, levels of tumor markers were measured to assess potential clinical antitumor activity at various dose regimens. METHODS: Patients received a total of 6 infusions of zoledronic acid in 28-day cycles: 4 mg via 15-minute infusion on day 1; 8 mg via 60-minute infusion on days 29 and 57; 12 mg via 120-minute infusion on days 85 and 113; and 4 mg via 15-minute infusion on day 141. RESULTS: Ten patients with multiple myeloma were enrolled, and 7 completed all 6 infusions. Median age was 58 years, ECOG performance status was ≤ 1 in 9 patients and 2 in 1 patient; 80% had received prior antineoplastic therapy, and 100% had received prior radiation and/or surgery. Three patients discontinued because of abnormal laboratory values (n = 2) or withdrawal of consent (n = 1). The most common AEs were fatigue (60%), myalgia (50%), arthralgia (40%), and nausea (40%). Increased serum creatinine > 0.3 mg/dL over baseline prompted a dose delay/reduction in 1 patient and discontinuation of treatment in 2 patients. In multiple myeloma patients, mean Cmax (± SD) was 329 (± 89) ng/mL after the first 4-mg dose infused over 15 minutes (1st infusion), 407 (± 105) ng/mL after the 2nd 8-mg dose infused over 60 minutes (3rd infusion), and 385 (± 114) ng/mL after the 2nd 12-mg dose infused over 120 minutes (5th infusion). Increasing doses produced proportional increases in drug exposure (AUC). Decreases from baseline were observed in serum markers of bone resorption; however, there were no consistent or meaningful changes in tumor marker levels (eg, serum IL-6). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that by prolonging infusion times to 1 hour and 2 hours using 8-mg and 12-mg doses of zoledronic acid, respectively, Cmax can be maintained and is similar to that obtained with the approved 4-mg dose infused over 15 minutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".