MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559464278 · doi:10.1071/rdv29n1ab200

200 THE USE OF LONG-ACTING FSH-MAP5 IN SHEEP SUPEROVULATION PROGRAMS

2016· article· en· W2559464278 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. C. Fry

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalineTheriogenologyOvulationInternal medicineEmbryo qualityEndocrinologyEmbryo transferMedicineAnimal scienceAndrologyEmbryoBiologyEmbryo cultureEmbryogenesisHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The administration of sustained-release FSH-MAP5 in a 2-injection protocol has been shown to be as effective as a multiple-FSH injection protocol in inducing superovulation in cattle (Bo and Mapletoft 2014 Theriogenology 81, 38) and in sheep (Fry et al. 2016 Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 28, 250); however, the effect on embryo quality in the latter experiment was unclear. The following experiment further investigated the effect of FSH-MAP5 on ovulation rate and embryo quality in a sheep multiple-ovulation embryo transfer (MOET) program conducted in the breeding season. Two hundred sixteen Dohne merino ewes received a 12-day CIDR-S device containing 0.33 g of progesterone (Zoetis, Florham Park, NJ, USA) plus 200 mg of FSH IM (Folltropin-V; Vetoquinol, Belleville, Canada) and 400 IU of eCG IM (Pregnecol: Vetoquinol) in 4 treatment groups. Group 1 (n = 51) received 7 injections (a.m., p.m.) of FSH in saline (2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.5, 1.0, 1.0, and 0.5 mL) starting 2.5 days before CIDR withdrawal and 400 IU of eCG in saline at the time of the first FSH injection. Group 2 (n = 53) received 6 injections (a.m., p.m.) of FSH in saline (3.0, 2.0, 1.5, 1.5, 1.0, and 1.0 mL) starting 2.5 days before CIDR withdrawal and 400 IU of eCG in saline at CIDR withdrawal. Group 3 (n = 56) received 3.3 mL of FSH in hyaluronan (50 mg of MAP5, Vetoquinol) and 400 IU of eCG in saline 2.5 days before CIDR withdrawal and 1.7 mL of FSH-MAP5 at 0.5 days before CIDR withdrawal. Group 4 (n = 56) received 3.3 mL of FSH-MAP5 at 2.5 days before CIDR withdrawal, 1.7 mL of FSH-MAP5 at 0.5 days before CIDR withdrawal, and 400 IU of eCG in saline at CIDR withdrawal. Ewes were inseminated with semen collected and pooled from 5 rams at 36 to 40 h after CIDR withdrawal. Donor ewes were slaughtered 6 days after AI, corpora lutea were counted on the ovary, and ova/embryos were collected. Data for corpora lutea, total ova/embryo, and transferable embryo was analysed by the Kruskal–Wallis test and differences between groups were determined by the Dunn’s test. Results are shown in Table 1. There were no differences in the mean number of ovulations or total ova/embryo collected between any group (P > 0.05); however, those receiving eCG at the time of CIDR withdrawal (Groups 2 and 4) had significantly more transferable embryos than those receiving eCG at the time of the first FSH injection (Groups 1 and 3). In conclusion, the administration of the sustained-release FSH-MAP5 in a 2-injection protocol in sheep was as effective as a multiple-FSH injection protocol in inducing multiple ovulations and yielded similar number of transferable embryos, whereas the administration of eCG at the time of CIDR withdrawal resulted in more transferable embryos, possibly by improving fertilisation rates. Table 1. Results1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207