Disorder in a natural ixiolite: high resolution studies at 293 K and 120 K.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grice, Ferguson and Hawthorne [1] describes the ixiolite of Bernic Lake, Manitoba, Canada. According to these authors, the ixiolite is part of the Ixiolite-Tantalite-Wodgnite system and crystallizes in space group Pbcn, with general formula MO2, in a α-PbO2structure type. The structure of the mineral ixiolite from Volta Grande pegmatite, in Brazil, is herein described from high resolution (0.5 Å) X-ray diffraction data using MoKα radiation. This mineral has formula MO2, with M = Fe, Mn, Nb or Ta. Data were collected at 293 K and at 120 K from a well formed crystal (0.6 x 0.4 x 0.3 mm). 49868 and 32294 reflections were collected at 293 K and at 120 K, respectively. The structure of the ixiolite was well solved in both temperatures: at 293 K the mineral crystalizes in the space group Cmcm, and the structure was refined to R(F2)=0.0476, from 728 independent reflections. At 120 K, the mineral crystalizes in space group Pbcn, and the structure was refined to R(F2)= 0.0537 from 1357 independent observations. It is interesting to notice that the different space groups of the herein described ixiolite at 120 K (Pbcn) and at 293 K (Cmcm) is related to the different occupations of oxygen sites, as expected from the high mobility of oxygen atoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".