MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559616483 · doi:10.1107/s2053273314089074

Disorder in a natural ixiolite: high resolution studies at 293 K and 120 K.

2014· article· en· W2559616483 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leandro Almeida, Douglas R. Miquita, B. G. Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPegmatiteCrystallographyMineralGroup (periodic table)Crystal structureSpace groupChemistryHigh resolutionMaterials scienceX-ray crystallographyDiffractionMineralogyPhysicsGeologyMetallurgyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grice, Ferguson and Hawthorne [1] describes the ixiolite of Bernic Lake, Manitoba, Canada. According to these authors, the ixiolite is part of the Ixiolite-Tantalite-Wodgnite system and crystallizes in space group Pbcn, with general formula MO 2 , in a α-PbO 2 structure type. The structure of the mineral ixiolite from Volta Grande pegmatite, in Brazil, is herein described from high resolution (0.5 Å) X-ray diffraction data using MoKα radiation. This mineral has formula MO 2 , with M = Fe, Mn, Nb or Ta. Data were collected at 293 K and at 120 K from a well formed crystal (0.6 x 0.4 x 0.3 mm). 49868 and 32294 reflections were collected at 293 K and at 120 K, respectively. The structure of the ixiolite was well solved in both temperatures: at 293 K the mineral crystalizes in the space group Cmcm, and the structure was refined to R(F 2 )=0.0476, from 728 independent reflections. At 120 K, the mineral crystalizes in space group Pbcn, and the structure was refined to R(F 2 )= 0.0537 from 1357 independent observations. It is interesting to notice that the different space groups of the herein described ixiolite at 120 K (Pbcn) and at 293 K (Cmcm) is related to the different occupations of oxygen sites, as expected from the high mobility of oxygen atoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207