MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559643812 · doi:10.1071/rdv29n1ab37

37 NORMALITY OF NEONATAL REFLEX IN CLONED DOGS

2016· article· en· W2559643812 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erif Maha Nugraha Setyawan, G. A. Kim, Hyun Ju Oh, M.J. Kim, Anukul Taweechaipaisankul, S. H. Lee, Y. B. Choi, B. C. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflexBeagleMedicineLabrador RetrieverBiologyPhysiologyAnesthesiaInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the birth of the world’s first cloned dog, Snuppy, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) has been a useful tool to propagate the dogs with identical genetic information. However, it is known that cloned animals sometimes exhibit phenotypic instability or abnormality. There have been few investigations about the normality of the neonatal reflex in cloned animals. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the neonatal reflex in 3 breeds of cloned dogs including shepherd, retriever, and beagle from birth to 28 days of age. Through SCNT, 8 cloned dogs were produced. After birth, 3 types of neonatal reflexes were examined and scored. For examining the flexor dominance reflex, neonatal cloned dogs were held upright and the flexor position of the limb was scored. To evaluate the withdrawal and crossed extensor reflexes, neonates were placed in lateral recumbence and their forelimbs were allowed to relax. Then, the distal forelimbs were pinched and responses were scored according to the frequency and intensity (strong = score 2, variable = score 1, and absent = score 0). The standard responses of neonates were referred from Lindsay et al. (2000 Handbook of Applied Dog Behavior and Training 1, 31–47). Descriptive analysis was used, which was based on the scores from 3 referees who evaluated the videos. The flexor dominance reflex could not be observed (score 0.0) in shepherd by Day 8, in beagle by Day 14 and in retriever by Day 16. Withdrawal reflex began to decrease on Day 22 with score 1.8 for beagle and retriever but decreased in shepherd starting on Day 24 with score 1.8. Crossed extensor reflex for shepherd started to disappear on Day 14 with score 1.5 and completely disappeared (score 0.0) on Day 22; for beagle started to disappear on Day 16 with score 1.8 and was still found until Day 28 with score 1.1; for retriever started to disappear on Day 20 and 28 with score 1.7 and 0.7, respectively. Flexor dominance reflex disappeared in cloned shepherd at a similar time to standard but beagle and retriever seem delayed 6 to 8 days compared with the reference. Withdrawal reflex in all breeds showed normal changes that should persist until adulthood. Cross extensor reflex in shepherd was close to reference but in beagle and retriever was delayed beyond Day 28; this reflex should disappear before adulthood. This study demonstrated that normal neonatal reflexes were identified in the cloned dogs, with some variations among breed. To adapt neonatal reflex as a marker to confirm phenotypic normality in cloned dogs, further investigation using various breeds of cloned dogs and greater numbers of subjects is needed. This study was supported by IPET (#316002-05-1-SB010), RDA (#PJ010928032016), Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Natural Balance Korea and the BK21 plus program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207