MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Use of a surgically derived nomogram to predict high likelihood of Gleason score upgrading for favorable-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent seed brachytherapy.

2011· article· en· W2559889112 on OpenAlexaff
David Bowes, Juanita Crook, Kris Wallace, A. Evans, Ants Toi, Antonio Finelli, M. A. S. Jewett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomogramMedicineProstate cancerUrologyProstatectomyBrachytherapyHigh-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasiaCohortProstateCancerGynecologyOncologyIntraepithelial neoplasiaInternal medicineRadiation therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

114 Background: Crook et al have reported a 7-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 95.2% in 1,111 men with prostate cancer treated with Iodine-125 permanent seed brachytherapy (BT) at Princess Margaret Hospital. Two nomograms have been developed that estimate the likelihood of Gleason score (GS) upgrading for patients with favorable risk prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). The purpose of this project was to apply these nomograms to a cohort treated with BT. Methods: Records were examined for all men receiving prostate BT in 2006-7. 217 had favorable risk disease. The likelihood of GS upgrading was predicted using RP-derived nomograms created by Kulkarni et al (PMH, 2007) and Budaus et al (2010). Clinical and pathologic information were available on 208 patients to allow completion of the Kulkarni nomogram, and on 193 patients for the Budaus nomogram. Results: The median age of the BT cohort was 62 years (range 44–77), and the median PSA level 4.68 ng/ml. Clinical stage was T1 in 65%, and 47.6% had positive findings on transrectal ultrasound. Median prostate volume was 33.3 cc (15.0–72.3). Uro-pathology review was available for 93%. 84.1% had extended biopsies, with 40.9% showing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and 10.1% inflammation. The median % of positive cores was 25%, with a median maximum % involvement per core of 20%. Two men received androgen deprivation therapy for prostate downsizing. The median predicted likelihood of GS upgrading was 51.6% using the Kulkarni nomogram, and 43.6% using the Budaus nomogram. The median PSA after 3.2 years median follow-up is 0.18 ng/mL. Conclusions: In a population of men with favorable risk prostate cancer treated with BT, the estimated likelihood of GS upgrading using two surgical nomograms was substantial. The study cohort was taken from a larger population of patients treated over 10 years for whom 7-year DFS is 95.2%. This suggests that permanent seed brachytherapy is a highly effective treatment option for patients with favorable risk disease despite unfavorable clinical and pathologic factors. Patients should not be discouraged from brachytherapy on the basis of a high likelihood of GS upgrading. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→