MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Complications of Pediatric Apheresis.

2004· article· en· W2559917972 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bruno Michon, Michel Duval, Rochelle Winikoff, Martin Champagne

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineApheresisThrombosisAnemiaImmunoadsorptionSurgeryAdverse effectPediatricsInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives Even if the practice and applications of apheresis have grown over the last decade, the data in pediatrics are limited. The frequency of the complications is low in adults but there is a lack of clinical trials assessing the nature and the frequency of the complications in children. Methods We have revised the medical files of all patients (0–18 years old) who have undergone an apheresis at Ste-Justine Hospital (pediatric hospital in Montreal, Canada) between November 1994 and July 2002. The reported complications were: symptoms of hypocalcemia, hypotensions (drop of systolic BP ≥10 mmg Hg), complications of the vascular access (thrombosis and infection), reactions to blood products and severe anemia. Results A total of 1632 aphereis were performed on 186 different patients (32 distinct diagnosis). The procedures were plasma exchange (67%), peripheral blood stem cells collect (18%), red cell exchange (6,9%), cytoreduction leucapheresis (0,7%) and immunoadsorption (6,7%). Adverse reactions, although mostly minor, were reported in most of the patients. The more frequent complications were hypotensions (14% of apheresis and 48,4% of patients), hypotensions which needed bolus (4,8% of apheresis and 26,9% of patients) , symptoms of hypocalcemia (9,7% and 28,5%), allergic reactions (4,4% and 5,9%) and troubles related to the vascular access: infection (2,1% and 16,1%) and thrombosis (1,7% and 12,4%). A severe anemia (Hb < 70g/L) complicated 2,5% of apheresis (17,2% of patients). There were two deaths related to procedures. With a multivariate analysis, we have identified independent risk factors for occurence of complications: lower weight, lower hemoglobin pre-pheresis, pheresis in ICU and number of pheresis. Conclusion The incidence of complications of apheresis in our pediatric cohort is much higher than what is reported in adults. The adverse reactions can be explained by the citrate toxicity, the extravascular volume shift and the vascular access installed. We consider that apheresis in pediatrics present unique features and should be done in specialized centers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207