MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560010634 · doi:10.1002/mp.12038

Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography

2016· article· en· W2560010634 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Schullcke, Bo Gong, Sabine Krueger‐Ziolek, Merryn H. Tawhai, Andy Adler, Ullrich G. Müeller-Lisse, Knut Möeller

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersSeventh Framework ProgrammeLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungEuropean Commission
KeywordsElectrical impedance tomographyThorax (insect anatomy)TomographyLungIterative reconstructionBiomedical engineeringMedicineMaterials scienceRadiologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is an imaging modality used to generate two-dimensional cross-sectional images representing impedance change in the thorax. The impedance of lung tissue changes with change in air content of the lungs; hence, EIT can be used to examine regional lung ventilation in patients with abnormal lungs. In lung EIT, electrodes are attached around the circumference of the thorax to inject small alternating currents and measure resulting voltages. In contrast to X-ray computed tomography (CT), EIT images do not depict a thorax slice of well defined thickness, but instead visualize a lens-shaped region around the electrode plane, which results from diffuse current propagation in the thorax. Usually, this is considered a drawback, since image interpretation is impeded if 'off-plane' conductivity changes are projected onto the reconstructed two-dimensional image. In this paper we describe an approach that takes advantage of current propagation below and above the electrode plane. The approach enables estimation of the individual conductivity change in each lung lobe from boundary voltage measurements. This could be used to monitor disease progression in patients with obstructive lung diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or cystic fibrosis (CF) and to obtain a more comprehensive insight into the pathophysiology of the lung. METHODS: Electrode voltages resulting from different conductivities in each lung lobe were simulated utilizing a realistic 3D finite element model (FEM) of the human thorax and the lungs. Overall 200 different patterns of conductivity change were simulated. A 'lobe reconstruction' algorithm was developed, applying patient-specific anatomical information in the reconstruction process. A standard EIT image reconstruction algorithm and the proposed 'lobe reconstruction' algorithm were used to estimate conductivity change in the lobes. The agreement between simulated and reconstructed conductivity change in particular lobes were compared using Bland-Altman plots, correlation plots and linear regression. To test the applicability of the approach in a realistic scenario, EIT measurements of a patient suffering from cystic fibrosis (CF) were carried out. RESULTS: Conductivity changes in each lobe generate specific patterns of voltage change. These can be used to estimate the conductivity change in lobes from measured boundary voltage. The correlation coefficient between simulated and reconstructed conductivity change in particular lobes is r > 0.89 for all lobes. Unknown position of the electrode plane leads to over- or underestimation of reconstructed conductivity change. Slight mismatches (± 5% of the forward model height) between the actual position of the electrode plane and the position used in the reconstruction model lead to regression coefficients of 0.7 to 1.3 between simulated and reconstructed conductivity change in the lobes. CONCLUSION: The presented approach enhances common reconstruction methods by providing information about anatomically assignable units and thus facilitates image interpretation, since impedance change and thus ventilation of each lobe is directly determined in the reconstructions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyFrench-language works237,207