MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560022374 · doi:10.1101/gad.288969.116

SUV4-20 activity in the preimplantation mouse embryo controls timely replication

2016· article· en· W2560022374 on OpenAlexfundno aff
André Eid, Diego Rodriguez‐Terrones, Adam Burton, Maria‐Elena Torres‐Padilla

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes & Development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMinistère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la RechercheMinistère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la RechercheEMBOFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleYork UniversitySchlumberger Foundation
KeywordsBiologyChromatinCell biologyHistoneChromatin remodelingReplication timingGeneticsSomatic cellDNA methylationEmbryoGene expressionDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extensive chromatin remodeling after fertilization is thought to take place to allow a new developmental program to start. This includes dynamic changes in histone methylation and, in particular, the remodeling of constitutive heterochromatic marks such as histone H4 Lys20 trimethylation (H4K20me3). While the essential function of H4K20me1 in preimplantation mouse embryos is well established, the role of the additional H4K20 methylation states through the action of the SUV4-20 methyltransferases has not been addressed. Here we show that Suv4-20h1/h2 are mostly absent in mouse embryos before implantation, underscoring a rapid decrease of H4K20me3 from the two-cell stage onward. We addressed the functional significance of this remodeling by introducing Suv4-20h1 and Suv4-20h2 in early embryos. Ectopic expression of Suv4-20h2 leads to sustained levels of H4K20me3, developmental arrest, and defects in S-phase progression. The developmental phenotype can be partially overcome through inhibition of the ATR pathway, suggesting that the main function for the remodeling of H4K20me3 after fertilization is to allow the timely and coordinated progression of replication. This is in contrast to the replication program in somatic cells, where H4K20me3 has been shown to promote replication origin licensing, and anticipates a different regulation of replication during this early developmental time window.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes & DevelopmentSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207