Crise na periferia: Brasil / América Latina e Portugal / Sul da Europa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A crise contemporânea da sociedade capitalista e as suas consequencias sociais tem sido objeto de intenso debate em todo o mundo. Se no seu interior e mais ou menos consensual que a natureza da crise e estrutural – pois que envolve o processo global de reproducao social do modo de producao capitalista – o mesmo nao se pode dizer do debate em torno de suas formas de enfrentamento, das politicas economicas adotadas nos paises mais afetados pela crise dirigidas por governos de coloracoes ideologicas bastante diversas. Os principais analistas consentem na constatacao de que os chamados “paises em desenvolvimento” sofreram menos com a crise que se cronificou a partir de 2007/2008, seja porque ela tem seu epicentro nos paises centrais, seja porque alguns daqueles “paises em desenvolvimento” tem usado politicas economicas “heterodoxas”, supostamente pos-neoliberais. Este artigo busca mostrar que essa constatacao e uma meiaverdade, uma vez que no Brasil as politicas de combate a crise cederam vez em 2015 a adocao de medidas de austeridade, tal como as que foram aplicadas em Portugal e no paises de sul da Europa nos ultimos anos conforme podera ser visto no texto. The contemporary capitalist society crisis and its social consequences have been subject of vivid worldwide deliberation. If, at its core, it is more or less agreed that the basic nature of the crisis is structural - because it addresses the overall process of social reproduction of the capitalism - the same cannot be said of the debate around their ways to approach the adopted economic policies in the most affected countries, headed by governments of quite different ideologies. Leader analysts comply with the realization that the so-called “developing countries” suffered less from the crisis that raided from 2007/2008, either because its epicentre is mainly focused in the central countries, or because some of those countries have used economical heterodox policies supposedly post-neoliberal. This article tries to evince that this realization is only a half-truth, giving that in Brazil fighting policies against this crisis in 2015 gave way to the adoption of austerity procedures, similar to those recently enforced in Portugal and southern European countries, as shown in the following text. Palavras-chave / Keywords Crise contemporânea, Politica economica, Brasil, Portugal. Contemporary crisis, Economic policies, Brazil, Portugal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".