A 2017 Horizon Scan of Emerging Issues for Global Conservation and Biological Diversity

This is the eighth such annual horizon scan. An international team with expertise in horizon scanning, science communication, and conservation research, practice, and policy identified 15 issues, following widespread consultation and a Delphi-like scoring process to identify the most important. The issues were wide ranging, and include sand extraction, blockchain technology, use of robotics to combat invasive species, and new developments in energy storage and fuel production. We present the results of our eighth annual horizon scan of emerging issues likely to affect global biological diversity, the environment, and conservation efforts in the future. The potential effects of these novel issues might not yet be fully recognized or understood by the global conservation community, and the issues can be regarded as both opportunities and risks. A diverse international team with collective expertise in horizon scanning, science communication, and conservation research, practice, and policy reviewed 100 potential issues and identified 15 that qualified as emerging, with potential substantial global effects. These issues include new developments in energy storage and fuel production, sand extraction, potential solutions to combat coral bleaching and invasive marine species, and blockchain technology. We present the results of our eighth annual horizon scan of emerging issues likely to affect global biological diversity, the environment, and conservation efforts in the future. The potential effects of these novel issues might not yet be fully recognized or understood by the global conservation community, and the issues can be regarded as both opportunities and risks. A diverse international team with collective expertise in horizon scanning, science communication, and conservation research, practice, and policy reviewed 100 potential issues and identified 15 that qualified as emerging, with potential substantial global effects. These issues include new developments in energy storage and fuel production, sand extraction, potential solutions to combat coral bleaching and invasive marine species, and blockchain technology. We have conducted an annual horizon scan of global conservation issues since 2010 with the aim of highlighting, by consensus, emerging topics that are not yet widely known in the conservation community but could have substantial effects on biological diversity worldwide in the medium to long term. Our iterative, transferable process of horizon scanning, which is designed to be both transparent and democratic, is carried out by a team with a wide range of experiences and areas of expertise. Our aim has been to focus attention and stimulate debate about these subjects, potentially leading to new research foci, policy developments, or business innovations. These responses should help to facilitate better-informed forward-planning. It is difficult to gauge the direct effects of our horizon scans on the research, policy, or business communities, except through personal communication and hearsay. However, several topics recognized in our previous horizon scans received international attention during 2016. For example, we identified microplastics as an emerging issue in 2010 [1Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010; 25: 1-7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (304) Google Scholar]. There is now substantial action on this issue internationally, with several governments, including those of the USA and the UK, introducing legislative bans on microbeads in cosmetics and detergents, and many cosmetics companies voluntarily committing to halt their use of microplastics by 2020 [2Rochman C.M. et al.Scientific evidence supports a ban on microbeads.Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015; 49: 10759-10761Crossref PubMed Scopus (246) Google Scholar, 3Environmental Audit CommitteeEnvironmental Impact of Microplastics. Fourth Report of Session, 2016-2017. House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, 2016Google Scholar]. New research on the effects of microbeads has revealed biological responses in both terrestrial and aquatic environments, with evidence demonstrating that microplastics reduce the survival and fitness of earthworms Lumbricus terrestris [4Lwanga H. et al.Microplastics in the terrestrial ecosystem: implications for Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae).Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016; 50: 2685-2691Crossref PubMed Scopus (617) Google Scholar] and facilitate the accumulation of sorbed organic pollutants in fish [5Wardrop P. et al.Chemical pollutants sorbed to ingested microbeads from personal care products accumulate in fish.Env. Sci. Technol. 2016; 50: 4037-4044Crossref PubMed Scopus (288) Google Scholar]. Discussion of the use of gene editing to control invasive species or disease vectors, raised in our 2014 horizon scan [6Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2014.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014; 29: 15-22Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar], has increased dramatically over the past year, with a range of developments using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR). This approach is already being focused towards controlling diseases such as malaria, Zika, and dengue, by removing disease-carrying female mosquitoes [7Adelman Z.N. Tu Z. Control of mosquito-borne infectious diseases: sex and gene drive.Trends Parasitol. 2016; 32: 219-229Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (73) Google Scholar] or reducing reproduction in female mosquitoes [8Hammond A. et al.A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae.Nat. Biotech. 2016; 34: 78-83Crossref PubMed Scopus (673) Google Scholar]. The consumption, production, and marketing of plant-based proteins and meat substitutes (synthetic meat), another issue identified in 2010 [1Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010; 25: 1-7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (304) Google Scholar], gained traction in 2016. Several companies produced molecules found in meats, either from stem cells or by fermentation. More recently, we raised the issue of changes in the legal status of nonhuman animals [9Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2015.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015; 30: 17-24Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar] and in 2016 legislation was introduced by the New Zealand Parliament [the Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Bill] that, if passed, will legally recognize the Whanganui River as an indivisible and living whole, with both physical and metaphysical elements. The examples above demonstrate that our process has accurately identified issues that have since become more well known and significant; we look forward to further assessing the trajectories of topics identified in past horizon scans. For these issues, the time lag between our identification of an issue and it resulting in practical or policy consequences has been up to 6 years; clearly this is likely to be a lower bound as the first issues were identified only 6 years ago. At the same time, we recognize that not all identified issues will materialize: new innovations may be quickly superseded by others, initial promise may not be realized, risks may curtail adoption, or an unexpected development may shift the course of a trend. The length of time between an issue being raised and its consequences being felt demonstrates the value of our commitment to horizon scanning as a long-term project, and the importance of regularly revisiting issues. The methods used to identify issues were consistent with our previous annual horizon scans [1Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010; 25: 1-7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (304) Google Scholar, 6Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2014.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014; 29: 15-22Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar, 9Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2015.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015; 30: 17-24Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar, 10Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2011.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011; 26: 10-16Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (112) Google Scholar, 11Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2012.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012; 27: 12-18Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar, 12Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2013.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013; 28: 16-22Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar, 13Sutherland W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2016.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2016; 31: 44-53Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar]. The 25 core participants in the horizon scan (the authors) applied an inclusive, transparent, and repeatable process that is a modification of the Delphi technique [14Rowe G. Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis.Int. J. Forecasting. 1999; 15: 353-375Crossref Scopus (1424) Google Scholar, 15Sutherland W.J. et al.Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy.Methods Ecol. Evol. 2011; 2: 238-247Crossref Scopus (247) Google Scholar]. Each participant proposed two or more topics, either alone or following consultation with members of their networks within and beyond their organizations. Several participants used social media to canvass followers for issues. Proposed topics were required to meet the criteria of global relevance and limited recognition among conservation professionals. The 99 topics that were submitted reflected the input of an estimated 430 individuals. Short descriptions of the full list of topics were circulated to all participants in July 2016. Participants then scored each topic on a scale from 1 (well known, or poorly known but unlikely to have substantial effects on conservation of biological diversity) to 1000 (poorly known and likely to have substantial effects on the conservation of biological diversity and the environment). Each participant also indicated whether they had heard of each issue; the percentage of participants that were aware of each issue was considered in the final scoring process as a relative measure of the novelty of an issue. Each participant's scores were converted to ranks, and we calculated the median rank of each topic. Given the time available for discussion, we retained the 35 topics with the highest median ranks and three topics that one or more participants thought warranted further discussion, and one additional topic that was not included in the original 99. Two participants, neither of whom had proposed the topic, researched the feasibility, novelty, and likely effects of each topic if realized (three participants examined the newly added topic). The participants convened in Cambridge, UK, in mid-September 2016. Each of the 39 topics was discussed in turn, with the constraint that the individual who suggested a given topic, if present, was not among the first three people to on The focus of topics was during each topic was participants and the issue from 1 through 1000 as The 15 topics that received the highest median ranks the are The topics are not in rank but are by We present each topic as as and that many topics, if realized, could present either risks or opportunities for global biological diversity, the environment, and conservation efforts in the future. a of to has to coral over The and of bleaching is by a within coral in but have identified that are to et diversity with the of coral in to 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. These are the and responses of to and these responses bleaching et and of Evol. 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. This in our of the of the of in the as a of the survival of coral species in either through the and of of their or through more direct of the of such is et coral through 2015; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The risks with in the such as disease or unexpected biological have not yet been invasive and species can have effects on The and control of such species can be in marine environments, and on and could a of such with to two of the most marine species now being The is an that can a for accurately recognize for of coral on the over the past three G. et of coral on the and its 2012; PubMed Scopus Google and a of A is to the 2016; Scholar]. the are invasive an species that has the of by up to et drive coral fish 2012; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The the with an and for consumption, a can more and might more control species considered to be marine a could our to the range of invasive species the in the future. However, the of this approach are and might be in many for might on developments that this more the use of may be in or to areas for that the of have been used since the of Scholar]. developments have both their and and a range of new is emerging of in and 2013; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. such is the of a that and of of and has and effects. for the of such as by and are and the of that and can are The use of potentially to on available could and in more to the of one such that to identify species and their received from the and of The of with of species W.J. et al.A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2013.Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013; 28: 16-22Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar, The of and implications for conservation 2016; Scopus Google Scholar] could the of available to and most with the of and The in the international in for has in by terrestris and species New and of can to in or species or in the of such as in and can of invasive et of a by invasive Ecol. 2013; Scopus Google Scholar]. the global to are being and new have identified several in which terrestris is not yet present but for the species is including and areas of and et a approach to the potential of a invasive 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. There are of in yet the of for use has been a substantial to species, including can also as vectors, introducing novel infectious diseases as they to new P. et drive and in J. Parasitol. 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. control is widely used in and of and but it has been used on in control of in J. for of in and 2015; PubMed Scopus Google in and are now the widespread use of biological control or on or The the use of these as an to and as an of potential in the of of such as and are now for the research and development of biological control and the use of and A new to 2015; The potential effects on species and from of communities, to have not been may be beyond which substantial changes in the have the potential to affect between the and the the are not well understood et in controlling in and 2014; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. sand and of the of and this percentage is et of a and 2010; Scopus Google Scholar]. is used in diverse the of and in as well as in the of and and as and for sand to with potentially but risks and opportunities for biological and are from and and the of sand from their of sand include of species, or of and social and the of of sand is an and or However, opportunities for and the of are emerging et for marine sand 2016; Scopus Google such as the use of to have value or potential A. et to the of the of the use of sand of the of J. Sci. 2012; Scholar], use of for or of are also being The use of to control or has long the of The of international between the and during the for example, limited the of New are leading to an of in the USA and and affect the and survival of animals from to et effects of the on 2010; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et to 2015; 29: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. these may present a new to the of For example, has a of its with that may reduce among including a species with a estimated to be 100 et and the of the in 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The to which species can new and resulting will on are and and on use and in may affect the and of species, with effects potentially to lower The and of 2016; Scopus Google Scholar]. the of has been to drive in et to of use on the and of from a Ecol. 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar] and in and G. et the of and 2016; Scopus Google Scholar], to in the of the and of There is policy for the or of in the the and of the may the and of and For example, it is whether to in to of changes in the and of may have and long-term effects on species, and the of G. et the of and 2016; Scopus Google Scholar]. the past two has been a but in the above the and a in of et in and 2011; Scopus Google Scholar]. increased between and from to et 2016; Scopus Google Scholar]. This was with increased and increased of It has not yet been whether these changes are of a long-term or long-term but they be consistent with of on the have become more and such as by and could be by or including may also be by the or of such as and The and of species or could be potentially their of with et and in to and 2015; Scholar]. in the of could also drive that could affect such as the of or changes in the of or that be A. et of energy for in a 2014; Scopus Google Scholar]. potential energy is with areas above and is not become more consistent and the effects of to The of was proposed during the but were not The to the and to and the are to the with The to have been and in was a to the in the the more are in effects of are not well and are likely to on they are et conservation and widespread of energy in the 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. in but be likely to be in which could a However, could also to and of marine and fish in It has been suggested that is substantial potential for reducing and by in et of and its potential for in the 2016; Scopus Google Scholar], but the potential effects of such on species has not been from the can be with in the of the energy be that use to and to the fuel to an et system with 2016; PubMed Scopus Google a with and in which energy from a to and The is then to which the of the of of the et from a 2015; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar], the new may a range of products and up to more et system with 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. There is also for such to such as from pollutants fuel from and 2016; Scholar]. limited by the which the as a of and has potential as a energy in an A substantial constraint to many energy is the of energy is energy storage is also to the of the a with energy is a the was has a energy that of such a energy is to that of a of a that has and previous et and 2015; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. the results are the that a practical is unlikely to be available for a More recently, a new of the the was that could be used in a fully Z. et for 2016; Scopus Google Scholar]. The team to from this of to a practical within a These new could for with on species and and The development of a has the potential to the of and et of by and a 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The of by is a of the However, a of has been to in with and and to The of with this process are by the et of by and a 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar] to be This of could have in the of to fuel and It could the of for example, and reducing energy through the use of that could as as to is an further research and to become However, if realized, the of to and could reduce fuel use and innovations could also changes in towards production, with many effects on biological diversity et of a 2014; Scopus Google Scholar]. and storage could be a to reduce of from as long-term to has been in have a by which is in being for storage et for of 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. of and of a with and were for that in the of had been in the The that of the had been with the that such a process to of A is that this technique of energy and This can be if the is only such as and et the the and of a J. 2015; Scopus Google Scholar]. The of in the is the estimated of that be by all known to be it of this be practical to use storage in 2014; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar], a of have many on biological can be used as that are transparent, and on a of personal known as the of they have beyond could of a is a the being are and the of A. The of the blockchain beyond 2016; Scholar]. There are also with These include in is or are not including of the of by energy and et for Google to and in and and of in such as and are likely to as this new issues that in time, have effects on global conservation efforts and biological diversity is to and policy for Our horizon scans have emerging issues that may further research, in in action by policy and We recognize that are to of horizon issues, those to new each in the of are unlikely to be by our process if they have substantial effects. is is considered to be well known in one may be in The topics we identify of emerging research, changes in the of potential a in media or a new or to its potential effects et horizon scanning and using a of evidence to policy Report to the 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. We have discussed length for which a range of are being to the same or for of energy and storage or we aim to out those that we may an may be more the one issue or that we in our horizon scan should be as of its The or global effects on from widespread of a from to one of the technology. We discussed a and of gene in during both this and the previous horizon scans. We not to include it in our final of 15 issues it is a towards the of control of invasive species or disease vectors, a horizon issue identified in The was first for in gene for the of 2014; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar], and is more and proposed gene drive et is gene drive a or global conservation 2015; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar], but we were of its potential the time of the 2014 horizon scan. The potential conservation risks and opportunities with using for biological control have been discussed gene for the of 2014; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et is gene drive a or global conservation 2015; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar] to the of our it has not yet been used as the for an species control However, such use of might be considered as a horizon if was likely to be and in the of a et is gene drive a or global conservation 2015; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. of the issues this fuel from for production, coral to coral and use of and to and are products of the of It has been suggested that the is the of a increased biological changes in and and the widespread of will of might be applied to and as diverse as energy production, efforts to reduce and et al.A that and 2016; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. with gene and of such is likely to be to effects on biological diversity and the We also have but have not many of the effects and that may from the in and the USA being the These changes may have a on conservation many of the issues can be we are aware that including the in and the of or and and effects of on conservation in Ecol. 2015; Scopus Google can have effects on biological diversity that we may to identify on an annual At the same time, are global and to living in and to reduce the between and and of these will to have for biological diversity, conservation and of This is an of the by the and the for the of We the of who suggested issues or to We for the blockchain topic, for for for of coral to bleaching and for sand issues. is by is by

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.