MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Fear of cancer recurrence and quality of life among survivors of pancreatic and periampullary neoplasms.

2012· article· en· W2560133080 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Q. B. Petzel, Nathan H. Parker, Alan Valentine, Sébastien Simard, Graciela M. Nogueras‐González, Jason B. Fleming, Jeffrey Edwin Lee, Peter W. T. Pisters, Jean‐Nicolas Vauthey, Matthew H. G. Katz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineQuality of life (healthcare)AdenocarcinomaPancreatic cancerGastroenterologyPsychosocialHospital Anxiety and Depression ScalePeriampullary cancerDistressIncidence (geometry)CancerOncologyAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

289 Background: Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) is well documented among survivors of breast, colon and prostate cancer. Incurable recurrence is common following resection of pancreatic and periampullary neoplasms. The incidence and significance of FCR in this population is unknown. We hypothesized that FCR represents an important source of psychosocial distress following resection of pancreatic neoplasms. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with non-recurrent pancreatic ductal (PDAC), periampullary adenocarcinoma or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) treated with potentially curative surgery 1991–2011. We assessed 7 discrete dimensions of FCR using the Fear of Recurrence Inventory (FCRI) and evaluated quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial distress using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Participants completed these validated instruments by mail. Results: 188 (53%) of 355 eligible patients completed at least one instrument, a median of 49 months (range, 6–222 months) following potentially curative resection. Participants included 73 (39%) patients with PDAC, 55 (29%) with periampullary adenocarcinoma, and 60 (32%) with PNET. The median FCR severity score was higher than a previously established cutoff for clinical significance in 55%, 51% and 63% of patients with PDAC, periampullary adenocarcinoma and PNET, respectively. Older age, male gender, periampullary adenocarcinoma, negative lymph nodes, and longer interval since operation were clinical factors associated with lower total FCR score (all p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, only age (p=0.01) and gender (p=0.03) were independently associated with severity of FCR. A higher total FCR score was significantly associated with higher anxiety (r=0.64), depression (r=0.41) and lower QOL (r =−0.53), all p<0.001. Conclusions: Fear of cancer recurrence is pervasive following resection of pancreatic neoplasms, regardless of survivors’ histopathologic diagnosis, disease severity, or time since resection. Given its association with anxiety, depression and lower QOL, FCR represents a critical therapeutic target.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer survivorship and care→French-language works237,207→