A Novel Triple Purge Strategy for Eliminating Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) Cells from Autografts.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) remains an established curative approach for selected patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Patients for whom an allogeneic donor cannot be found or who are unable to tolerate allotransplantation require post-Gleevec alternatives. Autologous HPCT causes less morbidity/mortality than allotransplantation but CML cells in the autograft pose a potential risk for post-transplant relapse. An effective purging method for eliminating leukemic cells without compromising normal reconstituting activity would make autotransplantation a more attractive strategy for selected CML patients. In previous studies, we and others have shown that primitive CML cells are selectively killed after brief treatments in vitro with Mafosfamide (Maf) or Gleevec. Additionally, cultured primitive CML cells differentiate much more rapidly than their normal counterparts resulting in a selective depletion of CML stem cells after 1–2 weeks. Here we report the development of a novel autograft purging strategy that combines the use of a brief exposure of CML cells to Gleevec plus Maf followed by extended culture without cytotoxic agents but with added recombinant cytokines that favor the maintenance of normal stem cells. Methods: CD34+ cells were isolated from the peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) products of CML patients and normal donors, treated for 72 hrs with graded concentrations of Gleevec (0.5–1.0 uM) followed by 0, 30, 60 or 90 ug/ml of Maf for 30 min. Cells were then washed and cultured for 14 days in medium containing 10% FBS and 100 ng/ml each of stem cell factor (SCF), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and thrombopoietin (TPO). Following treatment, cells from each group were evaluated for total viable cells, BCR-ABL message by real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays and colony-forming unit-granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM) content in methylcellulose assays. Results: BCR-ABL+ cells were eliminated in the CML PBPC products from patients in chronic phase (n=3), but not blast crisis (n=1) when treated with Gleevec (0.75 uM) and Maf (60 ug/ml) followed by 2 weeks in vitro with SCF+G-CSF+TPO. Residual Ph positive cells by RT PCR Patient/Disease stage Culture alone Drugs alone (Gleevec 0.75 or 1uM + Maf 60ug/ml) Culture + Drugs 1-chronic phase/Gleevec refractory Positive Positive Negative 2-chronic phase/Gleevec refractory Positive Positive Negative 3-chronic phase/Gleevec naïve Positive Negative Negative 4-blastic phase/Gleevec naïve Positive Positive Positive Treatment of CD34+ PBPCs from normal donors with 0.75 uM Gleevec + 60 ug/ml Maf reduced CFU-GMs to 15% of input controls immediately post drug-exposure but these recovered to 320% of input after the additional 2 weeks in culture. Conclusion: Triple purging of CML cells with Gleevec, Maf and 2 weeks of culture appears to eradicate chronic phase BCR-ABL+ cells while retaining most of the normal progenitor activity as assessed by in vitro clonogenic assays. This approach may be useful as a strategy for purging CML autografts for Gleevec-refractory patients and, pending confirmatory results from in vivo xenograft assays, will be tested in a clinical autotransplant trial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".