MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560167292 · doi:10.1080/03632415.2016.1246871

Examining One State's Regulation Development Process to Manage Alien Crayfish Introductions

2016· article· en· W2560167292 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert J. DiStefano, Ronald A. Reitz, Emily M. Imhoff

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrayfishAlienProcess (computing)State (computer science)Alien speciesEcologyFisheryBiologyPolitical scienceIntroduced speciesComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Invasive crayfishes adversely affect fisheries throughout the United States and Canada. Recommended management strategies, such as regulation and education, limit primary introduction pathways (e.g., aquaculture, bait shops, pet trade, educational classrooms). We present a case study of our state agency's approach to collecting data to support regulation development and accompanying educational efforts in Missouri. We studied other agencies’ approaches, industry pathways, and stakeholder groups to develop and support regulations. We found that bait, pet, and aquaculture industries’ crayfish sales only constituted a small portion of their incomes. High school and college educators used crayfishes in lessons, with most being obtained from the wild or biological supply companies; some educators released live crayfishes to the water afterward. The biological supply companies providing specimens to educators often provided species that differed from ones advertised, including invasive species. Biological and survey data-supported regulations were implemented in 2012, and stakeholder input was used to revise them. A suite of pre- and postregulation education was aimed at the general public and targeted stakeholders to describe the problem and process. We believe that we used a science-informed process to partially close some important introduction pathways. Los langostinos invasivos afectan negativamente a las pesquerías en los EE.UU. y Canadá. Las estrategias de manejo que se recomiendan, tales como regulaciones y educación ambiental, limitan las vías de introducción (p.e. acuicultura, tiendas de carnada, intercambio de mascotas, clases educacionales). Se presenta un caso de estudio en Missouri sobre nuestro enfoque basado en las agencias del Estado en cuanto a la colecta de datos para apoyar el desarrollo de regulaciones y los esfuerzos educativos correspondientes. Para el desarrollo y apoyo de las regulaciones, también se estudiaron los enfoques de otras agencias, vías industriales y grupos de interesados. Se encontró que la venta de langostino por parte de las industrias de la carnada, de mascotas y de acuicultura constituye apenas una proporción pequeña de sus ingresos. Los educadores de enseñanza superior y media superior utilizaron langostinos para dar sus clases, siendo la mayoría obtenidos del medio silvestre o de compañías que venden suministros biológicos; algunos educadores liberan langostinos vivos al agua después de las lecciones. Las compañías de suministros biológicos que proveen especímenes, a veces ofrecen especies que difieren de aquellas que anuncian, incluyendo a las invasoras. En 2012 se implementaron regulaciones basadas en datos biológicos y de muestreos y fueron revisadas por insumos que proveyeron los interesados. Se ofreció tanto al público como a los interesados, una campaña educativa pre y post regulaciones con el fin de describirles los problemas y los procesos. Creemos haber utilizado un proceso basado en la información científica para cerrar parcialmente importantes vías de introducción. Les écrevisses envahissantes nuisent à la pěche aux États-Unis et au Canada. Les stratégies de gestion recommandées, comme la réglementation et l'éducation, limitent les voies d'introduction primaires (par exemple, l'aquaculture, les magasins d'appǎts, le commerce des animaux de compagnie, les salles de classe). Nous présentons une étude de l'approche adoptée par notre agence d'État pour la collecte de données pour soutenir le développement de la réglementation et accompagner les efforts d'éducation dans le Missouri. Nous avons étudié les approches d'autres organismes, les cheminements de l'industrie, et les groupes d'intervenants pour élaborer et soutenir les réglementations. Nous avons constaté que les ventes d'appǎts, d'animaux de compagnie, et d'écrevisses du secteur aquacole ne constituaient qu'une petite partie de ses revenus. Les enseignants des lycées et des collèges ont utilisé des écrevisses durant leurs cours, la plupart ayant été obtenues d'entreprises d'approvisionnement biologiques ou dans la nature; certains enseignants ont ensuite relǎché les écrevisses vivantes dans la nature. Les entreprises d'approvisionnement biologiques, en fournissant des échantillons aux enseignants, ont souvent livré des espèces qui diffèrent de celles dont la publicité est faite, y compris les espèces envahissantes. Des réglementations biologiques et issues de données de sondage ont été mises en œuvre en 2012, et les commentaires des intervenants ont été utilisés pour les réviser. Une suite d'instructions pré et post réglementation visait le public en général et des parties prenantes ciblées et décrivaient le problème et le processus. Nous croyons que nous avons utilisé un processus fondé sur la science pour fermer partiellement certaines voies d'introduction importantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFisheriesSame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207