Borderland Films: American Cinema, Mexico, and Canada during the Progressive Era by Dominique Brégent-Heald
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Borderland Films: American Cinema, Mexico, and Canada during the Progressive Era by Dominique Brégent-Heald Camilla Fojas Dominique Brégent-Heald, Borderland Films: American Cinema, Mexico, and Canada during the Progressive Era. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 2015. 448pp. Cloth, $60. In Borderland Films Dominique Brégent-Heald explores the idea of “borderlands” to draw together the visual cultures of the borderlands of the United States with Canada and Mexico. Few scholars attend to the role of the US-Canadian border in the cultural dynamics of North America—with such exceptions as Kornel Chang, Claudia Sadowski-Smith, and Claire Fox. Moreover, Brégent-Heald contextualizes her study in the Progressive Era, a time when political transformations in the North American hemisphere brought these three nations into intimate contact. The films of this period reflect and subsequently influence the geopolitics of the borderland regions by shaping policy and public opinion about the relationship of the United States to its neighbors. The north and south borderlands are places where ideas about the formation of national, gender, sexual, and racial identities are enacted and take shape. Like other film critics—notably Chon Noriega, Arthur Pettit, and Charles Ramírez Berg—Brégent-Heald argues that early images of the border emanate from narratives that predate the inception of cinema. And she notes thematic continuities regarding the meaning of borders and frontiers while observing the contrast between the Mexican and Canadian borders involving issues and ideas about US national security. This contrast, in which Mexico poses a security threat while Canada is perceived as nonthreatening, emanates from the Progressive Era and the symbolic [End Page 361] representations and storylines of cinematic features, persisting still into current political ideology. Yet both borders are central to ideas about US expansion; moreover, the concept of the frontier as a place to be conquered and colonized abides across the Northwest and Southwest of the United States and in the North in relation to the Klondike, often considered the “last frontier”—though others might argue that US expansion into the Pacific designates another final frontier. Brégent-Heald explores how visual culture and fictions embodying border mythology engaged the Progressive Era’s diverse publics, readerships, and audiences. Indeed, she shows that the border has often been deployed as a convenient shorthand for capturing the ideals of the Progressive Era, standing in for splits between moral values, opposing forces, and other spheres of difference and division, particularly with regard to race, class, gender, sexuality, and ethnicity. Although many of the films in this study are no longer in circulation or even extant, Brégent-Heald turns to their “paper trail,” borrowing Thomas Cripps’s term, to contextualize them, relying on their description in written texts—periodicals, biographies, literature, newspapers, and government documents—to provide a more complete cinematic portrait of the era. In each chapter she compares Mexico and Canada with the United States as a point of reference but not the defining center of her analysis. She teases out differences between the interrelated ideas of the “frontier” and the “borderlands” across various American colonial spaces in early Hollywood, noting how they contribute to the formation of US national identity. She notes parallels between representations of the “Southland,” or the southern US border spaces, and the “Northland,” or land abutting Canada and the Klondike, discerning the various symbolic meanings attached to these borderlands, particularly as imagined spaces of interracial intimacies and contact where normative gender and sexual identities might be redefined and challenged, particularly in relation to the production of racial boundaries. Borders, north and south, become zones where people encounter difference. Overall, Borderland Films is a clearly written and well-argued exploration of the impact of cinema on North American international relations. This sprawling and ambitious archive of hundreds of borderland [End Page 362] films is a much-needed corrective to border studies in the American hemisphere and a model of global and comparative border studies. It will no doubt become a key text of the field. Camilla Fojas University of Virginia Copyright © 2016 Western Literature Association
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".