Gebser 's Integral Consciousness and Living in the Real World: Facilitating its Emergence Using A Course In Miracles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
I n an impressive body of work, Jean Gebser (1985) claims to have identified and explicated nothing less than the foundational structures of consciousness as they have unfolded and become manifest in every artifact and idea of every human culture to which we have access. Upon reading the Ever-present Origin, one must immediately acknowledge that it is truly a remarkable achievement that is supported by an immense erudition. This statement finds support from the fact that the value of Gebser's conceptions appear to be receiving increasing recognition in recent times. To cite but a few for illustration, Colin Wilson stated; "[Gebser] seems to me possibly the most important thinker of the twentieth century" (Feuerstein, 1992, p. 9). This is no small compliment coming from one who has surveyed such a vast amount of the literature of the West. Also, Ken Wilber, considered by many to be the leading theoretician and synthesizer in the transpersonal psychology movement, has used Gebser's structures to provide a major framework for his spectrum model of consciousness as applied to cultural anthropology (see Finally, Georg Feuerstein, in his book Wholeness or Transcendence?: Ancient Lessons for the Emerging Global Civilization (1992), has found Gebser's conceptions so fertile as to be able to use them to provide defining insights and a new perspective on the great spiritual legacy of the Orient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it