MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560635244 · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw544

3rd ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3)

2016· article· en· W2560635244 on OpenAlexaff
Fátima Cardoso, A. Costa, Elżbieta Senkus, Matti Aapro, Fabrice André, Carlos H. Barrios, Jonas Bergh, G.S. Bhattacharyya, Laura Biganzoli, Maria João Cardoso, L. Carey, D. Corneliussen-James, Giuseppe Curigliano, Véronique Dièras, N. El Saghir, Alexandru Eniu, Lesley Fallowfield, D. Fenech, Prudence A. Francis, Karen A. Gelmon, Alessandra Gennari, Nadia Harbeck, Clifford A. Hudis, Bella Kaufman, Ian E. Krop, Musa Mayer, Hanneke Meijer, Shirley Mertz, Shinji Ohno, Olivia Pagani, Efthymios Papadopoulos, Fedro A. Peccatori, Frédérique Penault‐Llorca, Martine Piccart, Jean‐Yves Pierga, Hope S. Rugo, Lillie D. Shockney, George W. Sledge, Sandra M. Swain, Christoph Thomssen, Andrew Tutt, Daniel Vorobiof, Binghe Xu, Larry Norton, Eric P. Winer

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerOncologyMetastatic breast cancerInternal medicineCancerMale breast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) comprises both locally advanced (LABC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [1]. Although treatable, MBC remains an incurable disease with a median overall survival of ∼2–3 years and a 5-year survival of only ∼25% [2–4]. Some more recent series seem to indicate an improvement in median overall survival [5, 6].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.231
GPT teacher head0.537
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2,062
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207