MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560675593 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2016-314597.140

F5 Social cognition in huntington’s disease: evidence from a prospective study

2016· article· en· W2560675593 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elisa Unti, Sonia Mazzucchi, Giovanni Palermo, Lorenzo Kiferle, Cristina Pagni, Gloria Tognoni, Ubaldo Bonuccelli, Roberto Ceravolo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionPsychologyNeuropsychologySocial cognitionHuntington's diseaseAudiologyCorrelationInternal medicineCognitive impairmentDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyDiseasePsychiatryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Impaired social behaviour, partly related to altered perception of emotions, is commonly reported in Huntington’s disease (HD). Aims To evaluate social cognition in symptomatic HD patients and its possible predictors. Methods 12 HD patients (stage II S&F, CAG 40.5 ± 2.5) and 9 healthy controls, matched for age and educational level, performed neuropsychological (Montreal Cognitive assessment- MoCa; Mini Mental State Assessment- MMSE; Frontal Assessment Battery- FAB) and social cognition batteries (Faux Pas test, Bush vignettes test, emotion recognition from both faces expression and verbal stimuli, Strange stories test). After 2 years 8 HD patients were re-evaluated through the same tests. Results HD patients, comparing to controls, showed lower performances in social cognition, particularly in Faux pas test and Strange Stories, and in recognising negative emotions from face expression (KDEF scale) and verbal emotions (p < 0.05, p < 0.01), as well as cognitive impairment expressed by MoCa, MMSE and FAB (p < 0.01). MoCa and MMSE showed positive correlation with social cognitive tests. At the follow up there were no significative differences in motor and cognitive scales (baseline: MoCa 18.6 ± 4.7, MMSE 26.5 ± 2.2, UHDRS 35.2 ± 8.2); (Follow-up: MoCa 19.8 ± 5.6, MMSE 25.5 ± 3.4, UHDRS 36 ± 11.2). Statistical analysis revealed a negative correlation between CAG and Bush vignettes Score (p < 0.05). Moreover, patients with higher MoCa scores at the baseline showed better performances in KDEF total score (p < 0.05), in particular disgust (p < 0.05), and at the strange stories test (p < 0.01); whereas MMSE showed positive correlation only with strange stories test (p < 0.05). Conclusions The present study, albeit limited by small sample size, confirms an impairment of social cognition in HD; in addition it suggests CAG expansion and cognitive performances (MoCa and MMSE scores) as possible predictors of social cognition impairment in the course of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatrySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207