F5 Social cognition in huntington’s disease: evidence from a prospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Impaired social behaviour, partly related to altered perception of emotions, is commonly reported in Huntington’s disease (HD). Aims To evaluate social cognition in symptomatic HD patients and its possible predictors. Methods 12 HD patients (stage II S&F, CAG 40.5 ± 2.5) and 9 healthy controls, matched for age and educational level, performed neuropsychological (Montreal Cognitive assessment- MoCa; Mini Mental State Assessment- MMSE; Frontal Assessment Battery- FAB) and social cognition batteries (Faux Pas test, Bush vignettes test, emotion recognition from both faces expression and verbal stimuli, Strange stories test). After 2 years 8 HD patients were re-evaluated through the same tests. Results HD patients, comparing to controls, showed lower performances in social cognition, particularly in Faux pas test and Strange Stories, and in recognising negative emotions from face expression (KDEF scale) and verbal emotions (p < 0.05, p < 0.01), as well as cognitive impairment expressed by MoCa, MMSE and FAB (p < 0.01). MoCa and MMSE showed positive correlation with social cognitive tests. At the follow up there were no significative differences in motor and cognitive scales (baseline: MoCa 18.6 ± 4.7, MMSE 26.5 ± 2.2, UHDRS 35.2 ± 8.2); (Follow-up: MoCa 19.8 ± 5.6, MMSE 25.5 ± 3.4, UHDRS 36 ± 11.2). Statistical analysis revealed a negative correlation between CAG and Bush vignettes Score (p < 0.05). Moreover, patients with higher MoCa scores at the baseline showed better performances in KDEF total score (p < 0.05), in particular disgust (p < 0.05), and at the strange stories test (p < 0.01); whereas MMSE showed positive correlation only with strange stories test (p < 0.05). Conclusions The present study, albeit limited by small sample size, confirms an impairment of social cognition in HD; in addition it suggests CAG expansion and cognitive performances (MoCa and MMSE scores) as possible predictors of social cognition impairment in the course of the disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".