MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Single fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy in the treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Long-term results.

2011· article· en· W2560691627 on OpenAlexaff
Fabio Cury, Marie Duclos, Armen Aprikian, Horacio Patrocinio, Wassim Kassouf, George Shenouda, Sergio Faria, Marc David, Luís Souhami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerBrachytherapyToxicityProstateRadiation therapyUrologyAcute toxicityBiopsySurgeryCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

83 Background: We present the long-term results of a cohort of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC) treated with single fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) combined with hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy (HRT). Methods: Patients with intermediate-risk PC were treated exclusively with HDRB and HRT. HDRB delivered a dose of 10 Gy to the prostate gland and HRT consisted of 50 Gy delivered in 20 daily fractions. The planning target volume was the prostate gland with a 1 cm margin all around. The first 121 consecutive patients with a minimum of 2 years post-treatment follow-up were assessed for acute and chronic toxicity and disease control. Results: The median follow-up was 62.8 months. No acute grade III or higher toxicities were seen. Grade II late GI toxicity was seen in 9 patients (7.4%) and grade III in 2 (1.6%). Grade 3 GU toxicity was seen in 2 patients (1.6%), both with urinary obstructive symptoms requiring catheterization. A repeat biopsy was offered to the first 58 consecutively treated patients, and 44 patients agreed with the procedure. A negative biopsy was found in 40 patients (91%). The biochemical relapse-free survival rate at 5 and 8 years were 90.7% and 81.4%, with 13 patients presenting biochemical failure. Among them, nine were diagnosed with distant metastasis. Prostate cancer-specific and overall survival rates at 8 years were 100% and 95.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Our program of HDRB and HRT is well tolerated, with acceptable toxicity rates. Furthermore, results from re-biopsies revealed an elevated rate of local control. These results are encouraging and confirm that the use of conformal RT techniques, adapted to specific biological features, have the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio in intermediate risk PC patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→