MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560692557 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw172.68

Evaluation of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Microbiological Typing in a Serratia marcescens Outbreak

2016· article· en· W2560692557 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Li, Raidan Alyazidi, Joshua Osowicki, David A. Goldfarb, Peter Tilley

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's HospitalVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerratia marcescensMedicineOutbreakMass spectrometryTypingMicrobiologyChromatographyVirologyEscherichia coliBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. There is limited experience using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry for the typing of isolates in outbreak investigations. The performance of MALDI-TOF typing was evaluated against 2 different reference methods in the context of a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) outbreak of invasive Serratia marcescens. Methods. Outbreak-related patient and environmental isolates and frozen isolates of S marcescens within the past 10 years were subcultured and subjected to full protein extraction. Each extracted isolate was applied to 8 target spots and run in triplicate on the MALDI-TOF. A master spectrum was compiled for each isolate using MALDI Biotyper 3 software. A dendrogram was created using this collection of master spectra and compared with results obtained from 2 traditional typing methods, pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Results. Overall, 19 invasive and noninvasive samples from 14 patients and 11 environmental samples were included. Four blood cultures from 3 different patients were found to harbor identical S marcescens strains using PFGE and RAPD typing methods. These isolates appeared as a cluster on the MALDI-TOF dendrogram, with no distance between 3 of them and minimal distance separating the fourth one from the triad. The environmental isolates were demonstrated to be unrelated to all patient isolates using PFGE. Likewise, the MALDI-TOF dendrogram displayed 2 major clades, which predominantly separated the patient and environmental isolates. Conclusion. In a small invasive S marcescens NICU outbreak, typing by MALDI-TOF performed well compared with traditional methods. A particular attraction of this method is that it is increasingly available at clinical laboratories and can provide rapid results to inform infection control measures in real time. Further characterization of the strain discriminatory ability of the MALDI-TOF could expand its utility as a rapid way of typing in an outbreak setting as an adjunct to slower and less readily accessible typing methods. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207