MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Hox a Locus Is Strongly Targeted by MMLV in an E2a-PBX1 Induced B-Cell Leukemia Model.

2004· article· en· W2560700254 on OpenAlexaff
Janet J. Bijl, Martin Sauvageau, Guy Sauvageau

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular biologyBiologyLocus (genetics)TransgeneGenetically modified mouseGeneCancer researchGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We previously developed a B-ALL model from E2a-PBX1 transgenic mice (Bijl et al. Abstract 469 ASH 2003 and paper in preparation). We now exploit this model to identify oncogenic collaborators to E2a-PBX1. To achieve this, 18 newborn E2a-PBX1 transgenic mice and 23 control littermates were intraperitonally injected with MMLV. The occurrence of B-ALL in E2a-PBX1 transgenic animals was significantly accelerated when compared to control littermates (mean survival 162 ± 31 versus 191 ± 50 days, respectively, P=0.03), suggesting the presence of E2a-PBX1 specific collaborators. Inverse PCR was performed on genomic DNA isolated from seven E2a-PBX1 and six control tumors. Seventy-two different retroviral insertion sites were recovered from the tumors. Six common integration sites (CIS) for MMLV were identified; including two novel CIS, i.e. Pde4d, a phosphodiesterase, and a hypothetical phospholipase A930027K05Rik. Strikingly, the Hox a locus was targeted in six of seven E2a-PBX1 tumors, and only one of six control tumors. MMLV integrants in the Hox a locus were detected in a 19kb region located between Hoxa6/Hoxa7 and Hoxa10. Two tumors were targeted twice in this locus. Q-PCR analysis for expression of all Hox a cluster genes identified a significant increase for the Hoxa3 to Hoxa10 genes in the transgenic tumors when compared to the expression in a control MMLV induced B-cell tumor (see table, below). Hoxa7 and Hoxa6 were the most frequently and strongly activated (6/6 and 5/6 transgenic tumors, respectively), showing values of 5700 and 6600 fold over expression in one particular tumor. Interestingly, a Hox a locus insertion in a control tumor (table: last row) did not have any effect on gene activation. In this study we demonstrate a preference for MMLV to target the Hox a locus in an E2a-PBX1context. The resultant gene activation suggests that several members of the Hox a locus are functional collaborators to E2a-PBX1 in the induction of B-cell leukemia. Fold difference in expression for Hox a cluster genes in Hox a targeted tumors compared to a control tumor. Insertions a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a9 a10 a9/a10 −1 1 4 3 138 2 4 a3 17 55 1067 5700 6608 171 62 a10 3 1 11 98 38 3 −4 a9/a10 1 −1 2 21 9 2 −2 a9/a10 2x 13 6 19 221 191 85 2 a7/a9 + a10 8 4 11 66 44 9 149 a10 −2 −6 2 2 −2 −8 −5

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways→French-language works237,207→