MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Utilizing metformin as a radiosensitizing agent in the treatment of prostate cancer.

2011· article· en· W2560768786 on OpenAlexaff
Laurence Klotz, Natalie A. Venier, Avi Vandersluis, Rickvinder Besla, Neil Fleshner, Michaël Pollak, V. Venkateswaran, Alexandra Colquhoun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity Health NetworkSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetforminDU145HyperinsulinemiaMedicineProstate cancerLNCaPRadioresistanceCancer researchCancerInternal medicineIn vivoEndocrinologyOncologyClonogenic assayInsulinRadiation therapyPharmacologyInsulin resistanceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

89 Background: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a well recognized curative prostate cancer (PCa) treatment modality utilizing ionizing radiation (IR). In addition to mediating DNA damage, IR upregulates several intracellular pro-survival pathways including the insulin- like growth factor (IGR) signaling network. This may contribute to the intrinsic radioresistance exhibited by certain tumors. Diabetic patients with PCa experience poorer outcomes following EBRT than their non-diabetic counterparts. Some attribute this to diabetes-induced chronic hyperinsulinemia with consequent upregulation of pro-survival insulin/IGF signalling. Previous work by our group showed diet-induced hyperinsulinemia to enhance PCa tumor growth in vivo. Metformin, a diabetic treatment, alleviates hyperinsulinemia, and also exhibits anti-neoplastic properties. We postulate that pre-treatment with metformin to correct hyperinsulinemia may protect cells from radiation-mediated pro-survival insulin/IGF signaling. Thus we assessed the radiosensitizing potential of metformin using in vitro and in vivo PCa models. Methods: The effect of IR and/or metformin on colony formation rates was assessed in LNCaP, PC3, DU145 and PC3AR2 PCa cell lines using clonogenic assay. The combination treatment regimen was assessed in vivo using a murine xenograft model. Western blot and cell cycle analyses are ongoing to try and elucidate any mechanisms of interaction between metformin and IR. Results: Monotherapy with IR (1-8Gy) or metformin (0.01-10.0mM) caused significant dose-dependent reduction in colony formation rates (p<0.001). Combination treatment further significantly reduced colony formation rates (p<0.03). Preliminary results from our in vivo study show diminished tumor growth in response to combination treatment (p<0.0001), and are currently subject to ongoing statistical analyses. Conclusions: Our in vitro findings confirm combining metformin with IR significantly reduces PCa cell colony formation rates further than either monotherapy. Recapitulation of these results in vivo would provide justification for translating this work into a phase II clinical trial of metformin as a radiosensitizing agent. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer→French-language works237,207→