MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560797166 · doi:10.1111/cag.12327

Climate change and resource development impacts in watersheds: Insights from the Nechako River Basin, Canada

2016· article· en· W2560797166 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Ian M. Picketts, Margot W. Parkes, Stephen J. Déry

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaQuest University Canada
FundersReal Estate Foundation of British Columbia
KeywordsClimate changeGeographyDrainage basinWatershedResource (disambiguation)Environmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceWater resource managementEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Few studies to date examine the cumulative effects of climate change and resource development on social‐ecological systems, such as watersheds. In partnership with a watershed alliance we endeavoured to understand the interplay of climate change and resource exploitation impacts in the Nechako River Basin, which drains an area of 52,000 km2 in northwestern Canada as part of the Fraser River Basin. Existing regional climatic studies show a clear warming trend over the last century and a projected mean temperature increase of ∼2°C for the 2050s. Watershed stakeholders determined that hydroelectric development and forestry activities interrelate particularly closely with climate impacts related to ecosystem function, water supply, and (resultantly) community well‐being. Mining and oil and gas development do not currently represent a high level of concern, but will become problematic with future resource exploitation or climatic changes. The process was effective in grounding specific, day‐to‐day realities of climate change. The results illustrate the importance and challenge of considering both impact sources in tandem, and should inform ongoing regional planning and monitoring efforts. A major barrier to performing this type of assessment with regional stakeholders is communicating, cross‐referencing, and visualizing the interrelationships between climate change and resource development, which are independently highly complex. Les changements climatiques et le développement des ressources dans les bassins versants : leçons tirées du bassin de la rivière Nechako, Canada À ce jour, peu d'études se sont intéressées aux effets cumulatifs des changements climatiques et du développement des ressources sur les systèmes socio‐écologiques, tels que les bassins versants. Nous avons entrepris, en partenariat avec un regroupement d'organismes de bassin versant, de comprendre l'interaction entre les effets des changements climatiques et du développement des ressources sur le bassin de la rivière Nechako qui draine les eaux d'un territoire couvrant 52 000 km2 et faisant partie du bassin de la rivière Fraser dans le nord‐ouest du Canada. Les études climatiques régionales réalisées à ce jour montrent une nette tendance au réchauffement au cours du siècle dernier et une augmentation de la température moyenne projetée de ∼ 2 °C à l'horizon 2050. Les parties prenantes du bassin versant ont établi que les activités de développement hydroélectrique et de foresterie sont intimement liées avec les effets du climat agissant sur la fonction écosystémique, l'approvisionnement en eau, et finalement le bien‐être communautaire. Les secteurs de l'extraction minière et de l'exploration pétrolière et gazière ne suscitent actuellement pas de fortes inquiétudes, bien qu'ils risquent de poser problème à l'avenir avec l'exploitation des ressources ou les changements climatiques. Le processus a permis d'identifier des réalités particulières liées aux changements climatiques. Les résultats font ressortir l'importance et le défi de tenir compte simultanément des deux sources d'effets. Ils sont également susceptibles d'éclairer les mesures prises en matière de planification régionale et de surveillance. Une difficulté de ce type d'évaluation faisant appel aux parties prenantes régionales est de communiquer, d'effectuer des recoupements, et d'identifier les liens réciproques entre les changements climatiques et le développement des ressources, lesquels sont déjà hautement complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennesSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207