The Correspondence of Wolfgang Capito. Vol. 3: 1532–1536 by Erika Rummel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: The Correspondence of Wolfgang Capito. Vol. 3: 1532–1536 by Erika Rummel Andrew Pettegree The Correspondence of Wolfgang Capito. Vol. 3: 1532–1536. Translated by Erika Rummel, annotated by Milton Kooistra. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2015. Pp. xxx, 516. $175.00. ISBN 978-1-4426-3721-4.) Of all the first-generation reformers, Wolfgang Capito’s journey toward adherence to the evangelical cause was one of the most difficult and painful. As professor of theology at Basel, he was a friend of both Desiderius Erasmus and the printer Johann Froben. It was Capito who suggested to Froben the collected edition of Martin Luther’s early works that did so much to spread Luther’s teaching beyond Germany. In 1520 he became an adviser to Cardinal Albrecht von Brandenburg, archbishop of Mainz; even when, after much agonizing, he resigned his positions in the old church, these bonds remained strong. Here, in the third volume of this excellent edition of Capito’s correspondence, a storm erupts when Capito decided to publish a German translation of Erasmus’s De Concordia. This was already a risky venture, despite a preface that distanced the translator from the contents, and Capito only compounded the offense by adding a fulsome dedication to his old patron the archbishop. The judgment of fellow reformers was severe. An Augsburg friend reported that when the work was read aloud in the office of a local pharmacist (a charming and significant detail), “Some people were almost moved to fury because of the inconstancy shown by the preachers. Such things make many people exclaim, ‘By God and by the faith of men! The theologians barter with our souls, and play an atrocious tragedy!’” (Letter 522). [End Page 837] This incident illustrates the undoubted truth that academics do not always have the necessary skillset to negotiate a complex political environment—in Capito’s case, the intricacies of church building and interconfessional rivalries. By 1532, when this volume opens, Capito is a diminished figure, worn down by illness and playing second fiddle to Martin Bucer in Strasbourg. Many of the letters in this volume are institutional rather than personal, addressed collectively by the Strasbourg ministers or drafted by Bucer for their joint signature. This is the everyday life of a senior member of the ministerial team in one of Germany’s leading Protestant cities: offering advice to other churches, attempting to find suitable ministers for insufficiently staffed churches, and giving formal written guidance to the city council. Capito shows himself to be a good team player, but his personal feelings do not often shine through. He seldom unburdens himself to friends; indeed, much of the more personal correspondence in this volume consists of incoming letters from friends elsewhere. These letters demonstrate that Capito was a man who still commanded respect and affection but was not the figure of towering influence that might have been expected when he first adhered to the Reformation. The seasoned team of Erika Rummel and Milton Kooistra have done their usual excellent job of presenting smooth and lucid translations; the footnotes are concise and learned. Where letters are published elsewhere (in the correspondence of Heinrich Bullinger, John Calvin, Martin Bucer, Joachim Vadian, or Bonifacius Amerbach), they are summarized here. There is one further volume to be published to complete this excellent project. Andrew Pettegree University of St. Andrews Copyright © 2016 The Catholic University of America Press
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".