MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

PYRAMID and LYM2034: Targeted randomized phase II studies of bortezomib with or without immunochemotherapy in newly diagnosed nongerminal center B-cell-like (GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including rapid prospective non-GCB subtype identification.

2011· article· en· W2560907445 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John P. Leonard, James A. Reeves, Burhan Ferhanoğlu, Kevin Doner, Hyeon‐Seok Eom, Ian W. Flinn, J Raposo, N. M. Chowhan, Cheol Won Suh, Stephen J. Noga, Gayane Tumyan, Sein Aung, Julio Hajdenberg, Brian Ulrich, Kelly Pendergrass, George Mulligan, Aleksandra Rizo, Steven J. Kussick, F. Offner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaBortezomibVincristineInternal medicineRituximabOncologyInternational Prognostic IndexLymphomaCyclophosphamideChemotherapyMultiple myeloma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS226 Background: The recognition of prognostically distinct subtypes of DLBCL by gene expression profiling has, until now, not led to improved outcomes. Conducting targeted studies in prospectively identified, molecularly distinct entities is challenging. PYRAMID and LYM2034 are prospectively identifying and enrolling non-GCB patients (pts). This subtype has inferior outcomes vs GCB following (R-)CHOP alone (Lenz, NEJM 2008; Fu, JCO 2008). The rationale for these studies is provided by data suggesting bortezomib shows benefit specifically in non-GCB DLBCL resulting from inhibition of the critical NF-κB survival pathway, which is activated in the non-GCB subtype. Bortezomib + dose-adjusted EPOCH showed superior response rates and survival in non-GCB vs GCB relapsed DLBCL (Dunleavy, Blood 2009), and in newly diagnosed DLBCL, bortezomib + R-CHOP showed similar outcomes in GCB and non-GCB pts (Ruan, JCO 2010). Methods: PYRAMID is enrolling pts at 55 centers in the US; LYM2034 is enrolling pts at 86 sites in Canada, Australia, and countries in Central and South America, Europe, and Asia. Pts aged ≥18 yrs with previously untreated non-GCB DLBCL (PYRAMID: all stages; LYM2034: stages II–IV), ECOG PS 0–2, and ≥1 measurable tumor mass are eligible. Non-GCB tumor subtyping for both studies is done at a single central laboratory via the Hans immunohistochemical assay (Hans, Blood 2004). Non-GCB pts are then randomized to receive six 3-week cycles of R-CHOP alone (rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, all on day 1, plus prednisone 100 mg, days 1–5), or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 4 plus R-CHOP (PYRAMID) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 plus R-CAP (R-CHOP minus vincristine; LYM2034). The primary endpoint is PFS at 2 yrs in PYRAMID and CR rate in LYM2034. To date in PYRAMID and LYM2034, respectively, 100 and 167 DLBCL pts have been screened, and 34 of the planned 190 and 62 of the planned 164 non-GCB pts have been randomized. PYRAMID (NCT00931918) and LYM2034 (NCT01040871) are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→