MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560998897

Visions of Early Childhood Education in the 21ST Century : The Vygotsky`s Sociocultural Theory and Implication to Early Childhood Education : Dynamic assessment for young children

2000· article· en· W2560998897 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hae Ik Hwang

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly childhood education · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZone of proximal developmentSociocultural evolutionPsychologyCognitive developmentEarly childhoodDynamic assessmentContext (archaeology)VisionDevelopmental psychologyConstruct (python library)Early childhood educationCognitionSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was done to explore the central concepts of Vygotsky`s sociocultural theory. These concepts include the importance of social context, the sociocultural construction of knowledge, the role of language in development, the internalization of higher mental functioning and ZPD (zone of proximal development), and interaction of learning and development. Based on these critical reviews, this study was done also to seek implications applicable to early childhood educational practice dynamic assessment for young children. According to Vygotsky, social context influences learning more than attitudes and beliefs. It has a significant influence on how and what we think. Also, social context plays a central role in development. Like Piaget, Vygotsky believed that children construct their own understandings, and cognitive construction is always socially mediated : it is influenced by present and past social interactions. One of the most important concepts of Vygotsky` theory is ZPD. ZPD is a way of conceptualizing the relationship between learning and development. It is the dynamic zone of sensitivity in which learning and cognitive development occur. The role of education is to provide children with experiences that are in their ZPDs-activities that challenge children but that can be accomplished with sensitive adult guidance. One educational implication was suggested. Vygotsky expressed dissatisfaction with traditional ability and achievement tests as valid measures of children` s $quot;capacity to learn$quot;. In contrast to static assessment procedures, which emphasize previously acquired knowledge in terms of intelligence or achievement scores, dynamic assessment involves purposeful teaching within the testing situation. It attempts to distinguish a child` s apparent level of development, as might be measured by a standardized test, form the child` s potential level of development-the performance the child is capable of attaining with support. The difference between the two is child`s ZPD. To measure the breadth of the zone, dynamic assessment models use a pretesttraining-retest procedure. Feurestein`s, Budoff`s, and Campione and others` dynamic assessment models were reviewed and compared. Other educational implications and critiques of Vygotsky`s approach were also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.018
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly childhood educationSame topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207