MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561139580 · doi:10.1353/wfs.2016.0024

Passées sous silence : onze femmes écrivains à relire ed. by Patrick Bergeron

2016· article· fr· W2561139580 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mary Anne Garnett

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen in French studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilenceHumanitiesArtArt historyPerformance artHistoryAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Passées sous silence : onze femmes écrivains à relire ed. by Patrick Bergeron Mary Anne Garnett Bergeron, Patrick, ed. Passées sous silence : onze femmes écrivains à relire. Valenciennes : Presses Universitaires de Valenciennes, 2015. Pp 207. ISBN 9-782364-240285. 22€ (Paper). The eleven authors we are invited to rediscover in this volume of essays edited by Patrick Bergeron include three Canadians (Julie Bruneau-Papineau, Éva Circé-Côté, Adrienne Maillet), one Swiss (Catherine Colomb), and seven French writers (Marcelle Tinayre, Judith Cladel, Thérèse Bentzon, Lucie Delarue-Mardrus, Mireille Havet, Jane de la Vaudère, Valentine de Saint-Point). As Béatrice Didier notes in her foreword, the common thread that unites these women is “le silence et l’oubli,” a silencing related to their sex but also with multiple related causes that this collection seeks to illuminate (11). These causes include self-censorship, marginality (geographical, social, professional), and choice of genre. The selection of authors is partly fortuitous, the idea for the volume having emerged from a workshop, “Grandes oubliées de l’histoire littéraire,” held in Fredericton, New Brunswick, in 2011. In his preface, Bergeron affirms the possibility and necessity of a reassessment of these writers considered in their “contextes historiques, idéologiques et sociaux” (20) [his italics]. A number of the essays focus on a single work. François Ouellet devotes most of his article on Catherine Colomb to an analysis of her novel Les esprits de la terre (1953), “l’une des plus belles expressions romanesques du tragique qu’on trouve dans la littérature du XXe siècle” (33). Thérèse Bentzon is the subject of Jean Anderson’s study in which she compares Bentzon’s novel L’Émancipée (1887) to Sarah Orne-Jewett’s A Country Doctor (1884). A woman poet’s struggle for emancipation is the theme of Lucie Delarue-Mardrus’s Rédalga (1928). Melanie Collado shows how the story of the novel’s heroine was inspired by the life of the author’s acquaintance, the British poet Anna Wickham. France Grenaudier-Klijn’s essay highlights Marcelle Tinayre’s La femme et son secret (1933), a non-fictional text that constituted an ideological “revirement” on the part of the advocate of women’s rights (47). Judith Cladel belongs, like Tinayre and Delarue-Mardrus, to what Margot Irvine defines as “une génération de transition” that came of age in the Belle Époque and whose careers sometimes lasted through the interwar period and beyond. Irvine demonstrates the importance of both family and professional networks for Cladel, particularly her role as a member of the jury of the Prix Femina from 1916 to 1958. Another period of transition, this time in Québec, is represented by Adrienne Maillet, author of popular sentimental novels published between 1937 and 1954. Cynthia Lemieux argues that Maillet’s novels, although [End Page 142] still “soumis à la logique normative et morale de l’Église catholique, traditionaliste et patriarcale,” (163) also reflected the emergence of a new elite whose values were “plus modernes, urbaines et intellectuelles” (161). Literally transitioning between two worlds, the avant-garde of Belle Époque Paris and later Cairo as a convert to Islam, Valentine de Saint-Point remains a controversial figure, “mal connue” (189). Élodie Gaden makes a convincing case for the relevance of Saint-Point to readers today. The posthumous publication of écrits intimes has brought recognition to two women whose lives could not have been more diverse: Julie Bruneau-Papineau and Mireille Havet. Mylène Bédard offers a re-evaluation of the correspondence of Bruneau-Papineau (1823–1862), positing that her construction of a melancholic self-image was “une posture d’écriture se situant à la source du romantisme canadien” and “une stratégie d’écriture de résistance à une identité assignée” (99). The intimate journals of Mireille Havet, covering the period 1918 to 1928, only came to light in 2003. Emmanuelle Retaillaud-Bajac provides an overview of the life and an appreciation of the works of this “figure remarquable, tout à la fois lesbienne à la vie sulfureuse et diariste aussi prolixe qu’inspirée” (127). Few of the writings of the Montréal journalist, poet and playwright...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen in French studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207